GXLC vs. FFLC

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) and FFLC (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GXLC is passively managed, while FFLC is actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GXLC charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FFLC.

Performance

GXLC vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GXLC having a 8.50% return and FFLC slightly lower at 8.15%.

GXLC

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 8.50%
• 6M: 8.24%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFLC

• 1D: -2.70%
• 1M: -0.98%
• YTD: 8.15%
• 6M: 8.56%
• 1Y: 24.48%
• 3Y*: 22.32%
• 5Y*: 15.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLC vs. FFLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	8.50%	3.22%
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF	8.15%	3.36%

Correlation

The correlation between GXLC and FFLC is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025	0.95

Return for Risk

GXLC vs. FFLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLC

FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 56
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXLC vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GXLC	FFLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.30	1.14	+0.16

Drawdowns

GXLC vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLC drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, smaller than the maximum FFLC drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC and FFLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXLC	FFLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.08%	-19.72%	+10.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.98%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.72%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.88%	-2.70%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.50%	-2.99%	+1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXLC	FFLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.04%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.15%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.63%	13.12%	+0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.63%	16.96%	-3.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.63%	17.67%	-4.04%

GXLC vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLC has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXLC vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison

GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than FFLC's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF	1.02%	1.10%	0.82%	0.57%	1.67%	1.68%	0.89%
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF	0.64%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXLC and FFLC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, GXLC and FFLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, GXLC or FFLC?

On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXLC or FFLC?

GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FFLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXLC or FFLC?

FFLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.64% for GXLC.

What is the main difference between GXLC and FFLC?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for GXLC and 0.38% for FFLC.