GXLC vs. BUFH
GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXLC charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
GXLC vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXLC achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.21% return.
GXLC
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXLC vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 8.50% | 3.22% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.21% | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLC and BUFH is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXLC vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXLC | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 2.76 | -1.46 |
Drawdowns
GXLC vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLC drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLC | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -1.53% | -7.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -0.28% | -2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -0.18% | -1.32% |
Volatility
GXLC vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXLC | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.63% | 2.38% | +11.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 2.38% | +11.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 2.38% | +11.25% |
GXLC vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXLC has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXLC vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.64% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXLC and BUFH have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
GXLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
GXLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for GXLC and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for GXLC and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer