GXLC vs. AVUS
GXLC (Global X U.S. 500 ETF) and AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GXLC is passively managed, while AVUS is actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GXLC charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVUS.
Performance
GXLC vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXLC achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly lower than AVUS's 13.35% return.
GXLC
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- 8.02%
- 6M
- 6.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVUS
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 27.51%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- —
GXLC vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 8.02% | 3.22% |
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 13.35% | 3.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLC and AVUS is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXLC vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank
GXLC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVUS
GXLC vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. 500 ETF (GXLC) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXLC | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXLC vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLC drawdown since its inception was -9.08%, smaller than the maximum AVUS drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC and AVUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLC | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -37.04% | +27.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | -1.83% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -5.06% | +3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.77% | — |
Volatility
GXLC vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXLC | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.75% | 12.69% | +1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 17.35% | -3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.75% | 20.82% | -7.07% |
GXLC vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXLC has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXLC vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison
GXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than AVUS's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 0.94% | 1.08% | 1.27% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 0.35% |
GXLC Global X U.S. 500 ETF | 0.65% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GXLC and AVUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXLC is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVUS.
AVUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.65% for GXLC.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for GXLC and 0.15% for AVUS.
Find the right allocation for GXLC and AVUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer