GXDW vs. JPFP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GXDW (Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF) and JPFP (JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. GXDW is passively managed, while JPFP is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GXDW charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for JPFP.

Performance

GXDW vs. JPFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW) and JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GXDW

• 1D: -4.79%
• 1M: -7.53%
• YTD: 13.19%
• 6M: 9.90%
• 1Y: 9.86%
• 3Y*: 2.83%
• 5Y*: -10.83%
• 10Y*: —

JPFP

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXDW vs. JPFP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF	-10.24%
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF	-2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between GXDW and JPFP is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.85

Return for Risk

GXDW vs. JPFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXDW

GXDW Risk / Return Rank: 14
GXDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
GXDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
GXDW Omega Ratio Rank: 14
GXDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
GXDW Martin Ratio Rank: 13

JPFP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXDW vs. JPFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW) and JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GXDW	JPFP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.93	—	—

Drawdowns

GXDW vs. JPFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXDW drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than JPFP's maximum drawdown of -5.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXDW and JPFP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXDW	JPFP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.81%	-5.82%	-61.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.26%	-4.53%	-50.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.15%	-2.33%	-40.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.60%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXDW	JPFP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.56%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.39%	22.47%	+5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.18%	22.47%	+5.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.87%	22.47%	+7.40%

GXDW vs. JPFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXDW has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than JPFP's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXDW vs. JPFP - Dividend Comparison

GXDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while JPFP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF	1.24%	1.40%	1.08%	1.99%	1.48%	1.56%	0.48%	0.31%
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXDW and JPFP in my portfolio?

GXDW and JPFP have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GXDW or JPFP?

On fees, GXDW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXDW or JPFP?

GXDW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for JPFP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXDW or JPFP?

GXDW has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for JPFP.

What is the main difference between GXDW and JPFP?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GXDW and 0.59% for JPFP.