GXC vs. SPYM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GXC (SPDR S&P China ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXC is a China Equities fund tracking the S&P China BMI Index, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GXC returned 4.69%/yr vs 15.15%/yr for SPYM. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GXC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.

Performance

GXC vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXC achieves a -4.85% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 10.15% return. Over the past 10 years, GXC has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 4.69%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.15% annualized return.

GXC

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 6.09%
• 6M: -9.74%
• YTD: -4.85%
• 1Y: 3.49%
• 3Y*: 7.77%
• 5Y*: -2.07%
• 10Y*: 4.69%
• ALL TIME*: 4.93%

SPYM

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 0.26%
• 6M: 8.55%
• YTD: 10.15%
• 1Y: 21.52%
• 3Y*: 19.39%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: 15.15%
• ALL TIME*: 11.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF	$4.07M	$2.78M	$2.53M
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF	$811.10M	$977.30M	$1.09B

GXC vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF	-4.85%	30.84%	14.60%	-9.93%	-22.12%	-19.70%	28.31%	23.07%	-19.39%	51.66%
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF	10.15%	17.79%	25.00%	26.24%	-18.09%	28.78%	18.49%	31.99%	-4.78%	21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between GXC and SPYM is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2007	0.55

The correlation between GXC and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GXC vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GXC	SPYM
Consumer Cyclical	20.1%	9.5%
Financial Services	14.9%	11.6%
Communication Services	13.4%	9.9%
Technology	9.6%	38.5%
Industrials	6.8%	8.4%
Healthcare	6.0%	8.9%
Basic Materials	4.5%	1.7%
Energy	2.6%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	4.5%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.8%
Utilities	1.2%	2.2%

Return for Risk

GXC vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GXC

GXC Risk / Return Rank: 13
GXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
GXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
GXC Omega Ratio Rank: 13
GXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
GXC Martin Ratio Rank: 12

SPYM

SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 68
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 66
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GXC vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GXC	SPYM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	1.53	-1.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.28	2.14	-1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.28	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.11	2.21	-2.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.24	9.43	-9.20

GXC vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXC Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXC and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GXC vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXC drawdown since its inception was -71.96%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXC and SPYM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXC	SPYM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.96%	-54.46%	-17.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.77%	-8.90%	-8.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.54%	-18.72%	-6.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.78%	-24.48%	-24.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.23%	-33.87%	-26.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.76%	-1.41%	-31.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.86%	-7.11%	-21.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.51%	2.08%	+6.43%

Volatility

GXC vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 3.48%. This indicates that GXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GXC	SPYM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.39%	3.48%	+1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.92%	10.09%	+3.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.44%	12.83%	+6.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.70%	16.92%	+11.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.05%	18.01%	+8.04%

GXC vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXC vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

GXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, more than SPYM's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF	2.18%	2.40%	2.81%	3.70%	2.67%	1.35%	1.04%	1.60%	2.03%	1.84%	2.05%	2.85%
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF	1.03%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.79%	2.23%	1.75%	1.97%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXC and SPYM in my portfolio?

GXC and SPYM have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GXC or SPYM?

GXC has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to SPYM (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXC dropped -71.96% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

Which ETF is better, GXC or SPYM?

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.15% vs 4.69% for GXC. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GXC or SPYM?

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.15% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXC or SPYM?

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXC or SPYM?

GXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 1.03% for SPYM.

What is the main difference between GXC and SPYM?

GXC is categorized as China Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. GXC tracks S&P China BMI Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GXC and 0.02% for SPYM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.