GXC vs. ISVBF
GXC (SPDR S&P China ETF) and ISVBF (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - GXC tracks the S&P China BMI Index while ISVBF tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXC returned -2.07%/yr vs -2.55%/yr for ISVBF. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GXC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ISVBF.
Performance
GXC vs. ISVBF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXC achieves a -4.85% return, which is significantly higher than ISVBF's -7.08% return.
GXC
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 6.09%
- 6M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 1Y
- 3.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.77%
- 5Y*
- -2.07%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.93%
ISVBF
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- 6M
- -11.40%
- YTD
- -7.08%
- 1Y
- 0.32%
- 3Y*
- 7.49%
- 5Y*
- -2.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.07M | $2.78M | $2.53M | |
| $155.37K | $259.62K | $313.99K |
GXC vs. ISVBF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF | -4.85% | 30.84% | 14.60% | -9.93% | -22.12% | -19.46% |
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | -7.08% | 30.64% | 18.96% | -9.28% | -23.01% | -22.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXC and ISVBF is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, GXC and ISVBF have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXC vs. ISVBF — Risk / Return Rank
GXC
ISVBF
GXC vs. ISVBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXC | ISVBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.02 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | -0.06 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.24 | -0.12 | +0.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXC vs. ISVBF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXC drawdown since its inception was -71.96%, which is greater than ISVBF's maximum drawdown of -53.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXC and ISVBF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXC | ISVBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.96% | -53.78% | -18.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.77% | -24.14% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.54% | -24.14% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.78% | -46.06% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.76% | -24.69% | -8.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.86% | -32.58% | +3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.51% | 11.15% | -2.64% |
Volatility
GXC vs. ISVBF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) is 5.39%, while iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that GXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISVBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXC | ISVBF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 6.84% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 26.50% | -12.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.44% | 31.73% | -12.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.70% | 30.06% | -1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.05% | 30.07% | -4.02% |
GXC vs. ISVBF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ISVBF's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXC vs. ISVBF - Dividend Comparison
GXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, while ISVBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXC SPDR S&P China ETF | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.81% | 3.70% | 2.67% | 1.35% | 1.04% | 1.60% | 2.03% | 1.84% | 2.05% | 2.85% |
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXC and ISVBF have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISVBF has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to GXC (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXC dropped -71.96% vs ISVBF's -53.78%.
On 5-year performance, GXC leads with -2.07% vs -2.55% for ISVBF. On fees, ISVBF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GXC has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GXC has performed better with a -2.07% return vs -2.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISVBF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GXC.
GXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 0.00% for ISVBF.
GXC tracks S&P China BMI Index, while ISVBF tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GXC and 0.40% for ISVBF.
GXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GXC and ISVBF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer