PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWW vs. JNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GWW vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWW achieves a 29.79% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GWW has outperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 21.17%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.06% annualized return.


GWW

1D
0.35%
1M
5.96%
YTD
29.79%
6M
36.56%
1Y
20.24%
3Y*
23.74%
5Y*
24.53%
10Y*
21.17%

JNJ

1D
-0.26%
1M
5.50%
YTD
13.43%
6M
16.43%
1Y
53.49%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWW vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
29.79%-3.41%28.21%50.53%8.75%28.80%22.85%22.25%21.69%4.35%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
13.43%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%-5.13%24.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GWW and JNJ is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1984

0.28

The correlation between GWW and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GWW:

$61.84B

JNJ:

$567.68B

EPS

GWW:

$37.26

JNJ:

$8.65

PE Ratio

GWW:

35.01

JNJ:

26.85

PEG Ratio

GWW:

2.02

JNJ:

0.89

PS Ratio

GWW:

3.39

JNJ:

5.86

PB Ratio

GWW:

15.73

JNJ:

6.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

GWW:

$18.38B

JNJ:

$96.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GWW:

$7.20B

JNJ:

$66.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

GWW:

$2.82B

JNJ:

$31.62B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWW vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWW
GWW Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWW Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWW vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWWJNJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.57

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

4.91

-3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.60

14.52

-11.92

GWW vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWW Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWW and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWWJNJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

3.19

-2.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.60

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.55

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.54

+0.02

Drawdowns

GWW vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWW drawdown since its inception was -56.73%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWW and JNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWWJNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.73%

-50.67%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.00%

-10.96%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.50%

-15.95%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-18.41%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.60%

-27.37%

-14.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.06%

+6.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.01%

-11.88%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.29%

3.70%

+4.59%

Volatility

GWW vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is 4.56%, while Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that GWW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWWJNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

5.80%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.19%

12.41%

+5.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.80%

16.87%

+7.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.67%

16.87%

+7.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.54%

18.47%

+10.07%

Dividends

GWW vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

GWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than JNJ's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
0.71%0.88%0.76%0.88%1.22%1.23%1.45%1.68%1.90%2.14%2.08%2.27%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.26%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%

Financials

GWW vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
4.74B
24.06B
(GWW) Total Revenue
(JNJ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GWW vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
40.0%
71.5%
Portfolio components
GWW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

JNJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.

GWW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.

JNJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

GWW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.

JNJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GWW and JNJ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNJ has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to GWW (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWW dropped -56.73% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWW and JNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer