PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWW vs. FMCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GWW vs. FMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Farmers & Merchants Bancorp (FMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWW achieves a 36.88% return, which is significantly higher than FMCB's 19.95% return. Over the past 10 years, GWW has outperformed FMCB with an annualized return of 21.39%, while FMCB has yielded a comparatively lower 10.54% annualized return.


GWW

1D
0.80%
1M
4.70%
6M
34.12%
YTD
36.88%
1Y
30.98%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
25.95%
10Y*
21.39%

FMCB

1D
-0.25%
1M
-1.12%
6M
17.44%
YTD
19.95%
1Y
35.19%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWW vs. FMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
36.88%-3.41%28.21%50.53%8.75%28.80%22.85%22.25%21.69%4.35%
FMCB
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp
19.95%6.83%2.04%2.51%11.29%28.38%1.00%11.65%5.62%7.90%

Correlation

The correlation between GWW and FMCB is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GWW:

$64.95B

FMCB:

$915.00M

EPS

GWW:

$37.36

FMCB:

$136.58

PE Ratio

GWW:

36.83

FMCB:

9.68

PEG Ratio

GWW:

2.13

FMCB:

0.76

PS Ratio

GWW:

3.57

FMCB:

2.97

PB Ratio

GWW:

16.59

FMCB:

1.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

GWW:

$18.38B

FMCB:

$308.67M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GWW:

$7.20B

FMCB:

$243.83M

EBITDA (TTM)

GWW:

$2.82B

FMCB:

$131.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWW vs. FMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWW
GWW Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWW Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWW Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FMCB
FMCB Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWW vs. FMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Farmers & Merchants Bancorp (FMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GWWFMCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

4.41

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.00

11.46

-6.46

GWW vs. FMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWW Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the FMCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWW and FMCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GWW vs. FMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWW drawdown since its inception was -56.73%, which is greater than FMCB's maximum drawdown of -42.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWW and FMCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWWFMCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.73%

-42.00%

-14.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.35%

-8.01%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.50%

-14.32%

-10.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-16.91%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.60%

-25.24%

-16.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.38%

+5.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.99%

-9.62%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.51%

3.08%

+3.43%

Volatility

GWW vs. FMCB - Volatility Comparison

W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to Farmers & Merchants Bancorp (FMCB) at 4.98%. This indicates that GWW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWWFMCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

4.98%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.22%

14.46%

+3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.13%

19.36%

+5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.71%

20.90%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.53%

20.65%

+7.88%

Dividends

GWW vs. FMCB - Dividend Comparison

GWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than FMCB's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMCB
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp
1.55%1.74%1.71%1.62%1.54%1.59%1.94%1.85%1.99%2.00%2.05%2.39%
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
0.67%0.88%0.76%0.88%1.22%1.23%1.45%1.68%1.90%2.14%2.08%2.27%

Financials

GWW vs. FMCB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Farmers & Merchants Bancorp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
4.74B
76.87M
(GWW) Total Revenue
(FMCB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GWW vs. FMCB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Farmers & Merchants Bancorp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
40.0%
80.1%
Portfolio components
GWW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

FMCB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp reported a gross profit of 61.56M and revenue of 76.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.1%.

GWW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.

FMCB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp reported an operating income of 32.38M and revenue of 76.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.1%.

GWW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.

FMCB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Farmers & Merchants Bancorp reported a net income of 24.07M and revenue of 76.87M, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GWW and FMCB have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWW has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to FMCB (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWW dropped -56.73% vs FMCB's -42.00%.

FMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWW and FMCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer