GWW vs. BYDDY
GWW (W.W. Grainger, Inc.) and BYDDY (BYD Company Limited ADR) are both stocks. GWW operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials), while BYDDY operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, GWW returned 21.41%/yr vs 20.45%/yr for BYDDY. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GWW vs. BYDDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWW achieves a 30.92% return, which is significantly higher than BYDDY's -8.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GWW having a 21.41% annualized return and BYDDY not far behind at 20.45%.
GWW
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 30.92%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 22.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.36%
- 5Y*
- 24.71%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
BYDDY
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -13.95%
- YTD
- -8.48%
- 6M
- -10.33%
- 1Y
- -36.06%
- 3Y*
- 1.04%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- 20.45%
GWW vs. BYDDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 30.92% | -3.41% | 28.21% | 50.53% | 8.75% | 28.80% | 22.85% | 22.25% | 21.69% | 4.35% |
BYDDY BYD Company Limited ADR | -8.48% | 7.97% | 24.81% | 13.06% | -27.17% | 28.02% | 432.95% | -21.04% | -27.71% | 69.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between GWW and BYDDY is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2008 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
GWW:
$62.37B
BYDDY:
$100.56B
GWW:
$37.26
BYDDY:
CN¥3.03
GWW:
35.32
BYDDY:
24.67
GWW:
2.04
BYDDY:
0.18
GWW:
3.42
BYDDY:
0.87
GWW:
15.87
BYDDY:
2.73
GWW:
$18.38B
BYDDY:
CN¥779.53B
GWW:
$7.20B
BYDDY:
CN¥132.63B
GWW:
$2.82B
BYDDY:
CN¥33.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GWW vs. BYDDY — Risk / Return Rank
GWW
BYDDY
GWW vs. BYDDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GWW | BYDDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.84 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | -1.03 | +2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.20 | -1.59 | +4.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GWW vs. BYDDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWW drawdown since its inception was -56.73%, smaller than the maximum BYDDY drawdown of -97.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWW and BYDDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWW | BYDDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.73% | -97.38% | +40.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.92% | -35.21% | +21.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.50% | -43.68% | +19.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.50% | -48.16% | +23.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.60% | -58.18% | +16.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -43.25% | +42.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.01% | -63.73% | +52.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 24.19% | -16.58% |
Volatility
GWW vs. BYDDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is 4.85%, while BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that GWW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYDDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GWW | BYDDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 8.66% | -3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 28.41% | -10.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.78% | 37.02% | -12.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 45.80% | -21.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.52% | 47.24% | -18.72% |
Dividends
GWW vs. BYDDY - Dividend Comparison
GWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than BYDDY's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BYDDY BYD Company Limited ADR | 0.48% | 1.45% | 1.26% | 0.60% | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.03% | 0.47% | 0.28% | 0.52% | 1.92% | 0.00% |
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 0.70% | 0.88% | 0.76% | 0.88% | 1.22% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 2.27% |
Financials
GWW vs. BYDDY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W.W. Grainger, Inc. and BYD Company Limited ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GWW vs. BYDDY - Profitability Comparison
GWW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.
BYDDY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported a gross profit of 28.25B and revenue of 150.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.8%.
GWW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.
BYDDY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported an operating income of 7.18B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.
GWW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
BYDDY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported a net income of 4.08B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GWW and BYDDY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BYDDY has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to GWW (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWW dropped -56.73% vs BYDDY's -97.38%.
GWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GWW and BYDDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer