GWW vs. ARQQ
GWW (W.W. Grainger, Inc.) and ARQQ (Arqit Quantum Inc.) are both stocks. GWW operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials), while ARQQ operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 3 years, GWW returned 22.36%/yr vs -28.53%/yr for ARQQ. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GWW vs. ARQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWW achieves a 30.92% return, which is significantly higher than ARQQ's -37.84% return.
GWW
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 30.92%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 22.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.36%
- 5Y*
- 24.71%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
ARQQ
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- -37.84%
- 6M
- -52.03%
- 1Y
- -49.10%
- 3Y*
- -28.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GWW vs. ARQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 30.92% | -3.41% | 28.21% | 50.53% | 8.75% | 21.03% |
ARQQ Arqit Quantum Inc. | -37.84% | -43.67% | 227.76% | -86.87% | -84.93% | 158.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between GWW and ARQQ is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2021 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
GWW:
$62.37B
ARQQ:
$225.50M
GWW:
$37.26
ARQQ:
-$4.72
GWW:
3.42
ARQQ:
151.77
GWW:
15.87
ARQQ:
7.91
GWW:
$18.38B
ARQQ:
$1.43M
GWW:
$7.20B
ARQQ:
-$307.00K
GWW:
$2.82B
ARQQ:
-$68.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GWW vs. ARQQ — Risk / Return Rank
GWW
ARQQ
GWW vs. ARQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GWW | ARQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.98 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | -0.62 | +2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.20 | -0.91 | +4.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GWW vs. ARQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWW drawdown since its inception was -56.73%, smaller than the maximum ARQQ drawdown of -99.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWW and ARQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWW | ARQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.73% | -99.60% | +42.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.92% | -79.78% | +65.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.50% | -89.76% | +65.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -98.57% | +97.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.01% | -88.78% | +77.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 53.78% | -46.17% |
Volatility
GWW vs. ARQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is 4.85%, while Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) has a volatility of 35.65%. This indicates that GWW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GWW | ARQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 35.65% | -30.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 64.49% | -46.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.78% | 104.65% | -79.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 134.12% | -109.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.52% | 134.12% | -105.60% |
Dividends
GWW vs. ARQQ - Dividend Comparison
GWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, while ARQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARQQ Arqit Quantum Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 0.70% | 0.88% | 0.76% | 0.88% | 1.22% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 2.27% |
Financials
GWW vs. ARQQ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Arqit Quantum Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GWW and ARQQ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARQQ has higher volatility (35.65%) compared to GWW (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWW dropped -56.73% vs ARQQ's -99.60%.
GWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GWW and ARQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer