PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWOAX vs. GIDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWOAX vs. GIDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWOAX achieves a 15.86% return, which is significantly higher than GIDGX's 11.05% return. Over the past 10 years, GWOAX has outperformed GIDGX with an annualized return of 12.12%, while GIDGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.81% annualized return.


GWOAX

1D
-0.44%
1M
4.06%
YTD
15.86%
6M
17.59%
1Y
37.23%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
12.12%

GIDGX

1D
-0.54%
1M
3.01%
YTD
11.05%
6M
11.62%
1Y
24.50%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWOAX vs. GIDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
15.86%28.37%6.14%22.49%-14.10%18.53%10.53%26.56%-12.95%25.63%
GIDGX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio
11.05%15.74%20.59%17.92%-12.75%18.46%8.41%19.97%-8.26%15.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GWOAX and GIDGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.92

The correlation between GWOAX and GIDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWOAX vs. GIDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWOAX
GWOAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GWOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GWOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GIDGX
GIDGX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GIDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GIDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWOAX vs. GIDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWOAXGIDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.49

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

3.47

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.06

16.67

+0.39

GWOAX vs. GIDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWOAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is comparable to the GIDGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWOAX and GIDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWOAXGIDGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

2.57

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.85

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.77

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.68

-0.21

Drawdowns

GWOAX vs. GIDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWOAX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, which is greater than GIDGX's maximum drawdown of -31.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWOAX and GIDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWOAXGIDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-31.63%

-18.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-7.14%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.11%

-14.69%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.21%

-20.39%

-5.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.28%

-31.63%

-3.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.54%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-3.87%

-5.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.48%

+0.71%

Volatility

GWOAX vs. GIDGX - Volatility Comparison

GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) has a higher volatility of 3.26% compared to Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) at 2.50%. This indicates that GWOAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWOAXGIDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

2.50%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

7.66%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.40%

9.67%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

12.99%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

14.16%

+2.34%

GWOAX vs. GIDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWOAX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than GIDGX's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GWOAX vs. GIDGX - Dividend Comparison

GWOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than GIDGX's 5.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIDGX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio
5.56%5.92%12.06%4.32%8.89%8.41%1.99%4.85%5.67%3.35%2.97%3.21%
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
3.85%4.46%0.60%6.10%7.27%12.75%3.85%4.33%3.02%3.05%6.43%12.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, GWOAX and GIDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GWOAX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to GIDGX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWOAX dropped -49.84% vs GIDGX's -31.63%.

GWOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWOAX and GIDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer