GWO.TO vs. CNQ
GWO.TO (Great-West Lifeco Inc.) and CNQ (Canadian Natural Resources Limited) are both stocks. GWO.TO operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services), while CNQ operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, GWO.TO returned 14.86%/yr vs 18.90%/yr for CNQ. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GWO.TO vs. CNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GWO.TO is traded in CAD, while CNQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CNQ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWO.TO achieves a 25.54% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ's 37.78% return. Over the past 10 years, GWO.TO has underperformed CNQ with an annualized return of 14.86%, while CNQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.90% annualized return.
GWO.TO
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 8.18%
- YTD
- 25.54%
- 6M
- 27.21%
- 1Y
- 69.48%
- 3Y*
- 35.82%
- 5Y*
- 23.88%
- 10Y*
- 14.86%
CNQ
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- YTD
- 37.78%
- 6M
- 40.54%
- 1Y
- 42.74%
- 3Y*
- 24.87%
- 5Y*
- 29.81%
- 10Y*
- 18.90%
GWO.TO vs. CNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWO.TO Great-West Lifeco Inc. | 25.54% | 48.38% | 14.28% | 47.70% | -12.58% | 31.45% | -2.64% | 24.53% | -15.76% | 4.08% |
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 37.78% | 10.31% | 7.05% | 20.78% | 51.87% | 83.46% | -20.98% | 33.97% | -24.03% | 8.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between GWO.TO and CNQ is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.26 |
The correlation between GWO.TO and CNQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GWO.TO:
CA$75.72B
CNQ:
$94.95B
GWO.TO:
CA$4.85
CNQ:
CA$4.65
GWO.TO:
17.20
CNQ:
13.62
GWO.TO:
1.91
CNQ:
0.65
GWO.TO:
2.21
CNQ:
3.25
GWO.TO:
2.80
CNQ:
2.97
GWO.TO:
CA$34.77B
CNQ:
CA$40.74B
GWO.TO:
CA$15.81B
CNQ:
CA$12.53B
GWO.TO:
CA$6.15B
CNQ:
CA$22.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GWO.TO vs. CNQ — Risk / Return Rank
GWO.TO
CNQ
GWO.TO vs. CNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifeco Inc. (GWO.TO) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GWO.TO | CNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | 1.27 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.76 | 3.11 | +2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.70 | 7.98 | +13.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GWO.TO vs. CNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWO.TO drawdown since its inception was -67.52%, smaller than the maximum CNQ drawdown of -75.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWO.TO and CNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWO.TO | CNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.52% | -75.93% | +8.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.34% | -15.09% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.82% | -32.71% | +19.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.64% | -32.71% | +5.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.96% | -75.93% | +30.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.78% | +8.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.31% | -19.72% | +8.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 5.87% | -2.60% |
Volatility
GWO.TO vs. CNQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Lifeco Inc. (GWO.TO) is 4.80%, while Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that GWO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GWO.TO | CNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 8.73% | -3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.35% | 24.40% | -12.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 29.08% | -12.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 33.24% | -16.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 40.63% | -19.88% |
Dividends
GWO.TO vs. CNQ - Dividend Comparison
GWO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than CNQ's 3.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNQ Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 2.89% | 5.01% | 5.02% | 4.17% | 6.31% | 3.78% | 5.26% | 3.49% | 4.56% | 3.08% | 2.94% | 4.21% |
GWO.TO Great-West Lifeco Inc. | 3.07% | 3.60% | 4.66% | 4.74% | 6.26% | 4.75% | 5.77% | 4.97% | 5.52% | 4.18% | 3.94% | 3.78% |
Financials
GWO.TO vs. CNQ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Great-West Lifeco Inc. and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GWO.TO vs. CNQ - Profitability Comparison
GWO.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Great-West Lifeco Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.62B and revenue of 7.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.9%.
CNQ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 10.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.
GWO.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Great-West Lifeco Inc. reported an operating income of 1.61B and revenue of 7.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.
CNQ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported an operating income of 2.68B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.
GWO.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Great-West Lifeco Inc. reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 7.73B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.
CNQ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Natural Resources Limited reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 10.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GWO.TO and CNQ have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GWO.TO and CNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer