GVUS vs. ELCV
GVUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF) and ELCV (Eventide High Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. GVUS is passively managed, while ELCV is actively managed. Over the past year, GVUS returned 28.22% vs 30.91% for ELCV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GVUS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ELCV.
Performance
GVUS vs. ELCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GVUS achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly lower than ELCV's 21.38% return.
GVUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ELCV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 4.35%
- YTD
- 21.38%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- 1Y
- 30.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GVUS vs. ELCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 14.24% | 15.90% | -1.69% |
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF | 21.38% | 9.96% | -1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GVUS and ELCV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.82 |
The correlation between GVUS and ELCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GVUS vs. ELCV — Risk / Return Rank
GVUS
ELCV
GVUS vs. ELCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GVUS | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.48 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 6.15 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.70 | 21.81 | -4.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GVUS | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61 | 2.71 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.55 | 1.15 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
GVUS vs. ELCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum ELCV drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and ELCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GVUS | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -18.38% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -5.05% | -1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -3.75% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.43% | +0.17% |
Volatility
GVUS vs. ELCV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) is 3.01%, while Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that GVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GVUS | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 3.61% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.14% | 8.75% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.86% | 11.47% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 15.38% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 15.38% | -2.10% |
GVUS vs. ELCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ELCV's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
GVUS vs. ELCV - Dividend Comparison
GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than ELCV's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF | 1.76% | 2.34% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF | 1.58% | 1.77% | 2.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GVUS and ELCV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ELCV has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to GVUS (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVUS dropped -15.82% vs ELCV's -18.38%.
On 1-year performance, ELCV leads with 30.91% vs 28.22% for GVUS. On fees, GVUS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GVUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ELCV has performed better with a 30.91% return vs 28.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GVUS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ELCV.
ELCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.58% for GVUS.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Eventide. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.49% for ELCV.
ELCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GVUS and ELCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer