GVUS vs. CSTK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GVUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF) and CSTK (Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. GVUS is passively managed, while CSTK is actively managed. Over the past year, GVUS returned 28.22% vs 26.71% for CSTK. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GVUS charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSTK.

Performance

GVUS vs. CSTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVUS achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than CSTK's 11.29% return.

GVUS

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 4.34%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 6M: 14.89%
• 1Y: 28.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSTK

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 3.59%
• YTD: 11.29%
• 6M: 13.04%
• 1Y: 26.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVUS vs. CSTK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF	14.24%	16.00%
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF	11.29%	18.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GVUS and CSTK is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025	0.95

The correlation between GVUS and CSTK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GVUS vs. CSTK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVUS

GVUS Risk / Return Rank: 82
GVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 80
GVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
GVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 85

CSTK

CSTK Risk / Return Rank: 70
CSTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
CSTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
CSTK Omega Ratio Rank: 71
CSTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CSTK Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVUS vs. CSTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) and Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GVUS	CSTK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.38	+0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	3.42	+0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.42	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.24	3.02	+1.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.70	11.85	+5.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GVUS vs. CSTK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the CSTK Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVUS and CSTK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GVUS	CSTK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	2.38	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.55	2.54	-0.99

Drawdowns

GVUS vs. CSTK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, which is greater than CSTK's maximum drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVUS and CSTK.

Drawdown Indicators

	GVUS	CSTK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.82%	-8.87%	-6.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.68%	-8.87%	+2.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.60%	+0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.01%	-1.28%	-0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	2.26%	-0.66%

Volatility

GVUS vs. CSTK - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF (GVUS) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF (CSTK) at 2.68%. This indicates that GVUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSTK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GVUS	CSTK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	2.68%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.14%	8.45%	-0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.86%	11.28%	-0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.28%	11.60%	+1.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.28%	11.60%	+1.68%

GVUS vs. CSTK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVUS has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CSTK's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

GVUS vs. CSTK - Dividend Comparison

GVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than CSTK's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CSTK Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF	1.77%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%
GVUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF	1.58%	1.77%	2.04%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GVUS and CSTK in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, GVUS and CSTK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GVUS or CSTK?

GVUS has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to CSTK (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVUS dropped -15.82% vs CSTK's -8.87%.

Which ETF is better, GVUS or CSTK?

On 1-year performance, GVUS leads with 28.22% vs 26.71% for CSTK. On fees, GVUS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, CSTK has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GVUS or CSTK?

Over the 1-year period, GVUS has performed better with a 28.22% return vs 26.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GVUS or CSTK?

GVUS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CSTK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GVUS or CSTK?

CSTK has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.58% for GVUS.

What is the main difference between GVUS and CSTK?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GVUS and 0.35% for CSTK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GVUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.