GVIP vs. RFDA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GVIP (Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. GVIP is passively managed, while RFDA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GVIP returned 10.95%/yr vs 12.90%/yr for RFDA. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GVIP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.

Performance

GVIP vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVIP achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than RFDA's 14.14% return.

GVIP

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -6.63%
• 6M: 5.72%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 1Y: 21.61%
• 3Y*: 24.01%
• 5Y*: 10.95%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.41%

RFDA

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.66%
• 6M: 12.44%
• YTD: 14.14%
• 1Y: 26.35%
• 3Y*: 17.71%
• 5Y*: 12.90%
• 10Y*: 13.32%
• ALL TIME*: 13.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF	$2.23M	$1.88M	$2.26M
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	$102.21K	$102.34K	$118.80K

GVIP vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF	8.45%	25.27%	29.82%	39.15%	-31.95%	11.86%	44.12%	30.21%	-6.85%	25.79%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	14.14%	16.42%	20.12%	16.98%	-8.58%	25.94%	11.26%	27.15%	-9.27%	19.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GVIP and RFDA is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2016	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between GVIP and RFDA has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GVIP vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GVIP	RFDA
Technology	37.9%	15.4%
Financial Services	15.5%	18.8%
Communication Services	11.7%	6.2%
Industrials	11.1%	9.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	8.1%
Healthcare	8.6%	12.2%
Utilities	5.9%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	7.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.8%
Energy	-	11.1%
Real Estate	-	5.1%

Return for Risk

GVIP vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GVIP

GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 36
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 42

RFDA

RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 89
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 86
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GVIP vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GVIP	RFDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	2.07	-1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	2.85	-1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.38	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	4.47	-3.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.60	15.99	-11.38

GVIP vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVIP Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the RFDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVIP and RFDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GVIP vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVIP drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, which is greater than RFDA's maximum drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVIP and RFDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GVIP	RFDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.09%	-34.60%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.36%	-5.45%	-10.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.29%	-19.35%	-3.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.09%	-19.35%	-17.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.39%	-0.84%	-11.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.57%	-3.70%	-3.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.26%	1.52%	+2.74%

Volatility

GVIP vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 2.85%. This indicates that GVIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GVIP	RFDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.71%	2.85%	+6.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.33%	8.65%	+11.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.29%	11.76%	+11.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.24%	15.72%	+6.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.02%	16.84%	+5.18%

GVIP vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVIP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

GVIP vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

GVIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than RFDA's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF	0.31%	0.34%	0.29%	0.77%	0.02%	0.00%	0.12%	0.77%	0.44%	0.45%	0.08%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	1.77%	1.89%	2.23%	2.68%	3.57%	1.44%	1.62%	1.87%	2.44%	1.90%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GVIP and RFDA in my portfolio?

GVIP and RFDA have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GVIP or RFDA?

GVIP has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to RFDA (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVIP dropped -37.09% vs RFDA's -34.60%.

Which ETF is better, GVIP or RFDA?

On 5-year performance, RFDA leads with 12.90% vs 10.95% for GVIP. On fees, GVIP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GVIP or RFDA?

Over the 5-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 12.90% return vs 10.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GVIP or RFDA?

GVIP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GVIP or RFDA?

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.31% for GVIP.

What is the main difference between GVIP and RFDA?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GVIP and 0.52% for RFDA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.