GVIP vs. IUSG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GVIP (Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - GVIP tracks the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index while IUSG tracks the S&P 900 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GVIP returned 12.53%/yr vs 13.77%/yr for IUSG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GVIP charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.

Performance

GVIP vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVIP achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly higher than IUSG's 9.19% return.

GVIP

• 1D: -6.01%
• 1M: 3.42%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 6M: 15.67%
• 1Y: 35.53%
• 3Y*: 29.99%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: —

IUSG

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: -1.86%
• YTD: 9.19%
• 6M: 7.87%
• 1Y: 26.96%
• 3Y*: 25.00%
• 5Y*: 13.77%
• 10Y*: 17.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVIP vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF	16.34%	25.27%	29.82%	39.15%	-31.95%	11.86%	44.12%	30.21%	-6.85%	25.79%
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	9.19%	21.23%	34.70%	29.28%	-28.81%	31.26%	32.65%	30.62%	-0.79%	27.02%

Correlation

The correlation between GVIP and IUSG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2016	0.90

The correlation between GVIP and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

GVIP vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GVIP	IUSG
Technology	34.8%	50.8%
Financial Services	16.0%	8.7%
Communication Services	13.7%	15.2%
Industrials	11.0%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	8.4%
Healthcare	8.2%	6.4%
Utilities	6.3%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	1.2%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Energy	-	0.3%
Real Estate	-	0.8%

Return for Risk

GVIP vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVIP

GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 54
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 51
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 64

IUSG

IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 47
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVIP vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GVIP	IUSG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.60	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	2.20	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.28	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	2.07	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.04	8.45	+2.59

GVIP vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVIP Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVIP and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GVIP vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVIP drawdown since its inception was -37.09%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVIP and IUSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GVIP	IUSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.09%	-63.41%	+26.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.67%	-13.07%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.29%	-22.28%	-1.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.09%	-32.21%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.01%	-5.23%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.56%	-21.40%	+13.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	3.20%	+0.03%

Volatility

GVIP vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) at 7.16%. This indicates that GVIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GVIP	IUSG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.43%	7.16%	+4.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.87%	13.66%	+4.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.01%	16.92%	+4.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.83%	21.06%	+0.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.87%	20.48%	+1.39%

GVIP vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVIP has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

GVIP vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

GVIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than IUSG's 0.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GVIP Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF	0.29%	0.34%	0.29%	0.77%	0.02%	0.00%	0.12%	0.77%	0.44%	0.45%	0.08%	0.00%
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	0.50%	0.53%	0.59%	1.12%	1.07%	0.59%	0.93%	1.64%	1.32%	1.28%	1.48%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GVIP and IUSG in my portfolio?

GVIP and IUSG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GVIP or IUSG?

GVIP has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to IUSG (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVIP dropped -37.09% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

Which ETF is better, GVIP or IUSG?

On 5-year performance, IUSG leads with 13.77% vs 12.53% for GVIP. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSG has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GVIP or IUSG?

Over the 5-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 13.77% return vs 12.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GVIP or IUSG?

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GVIP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GVIP or IUSG?

IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.29% for GVIP.

What is the main difference between GVIP and IUSG?

GVIP tracks Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GVIP and 0.04% for IUSG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GVIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.