PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVI vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVI vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVI achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -26.71% return.


GVI

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.11%
6M
0.23%
YTD
0.22%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
1.75%

IBIT

1D
-1.14%
1M
-2.10%
6M
-32.61%
YTD
-26.71%
1Y
-46.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVI vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GVI
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF
0.22%6.66%3.37%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-26.71%-6.41%89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GVI and IBIT is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVI vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVI
GVI Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVI Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVI vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GVIIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.82

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

-0.87

+2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.93

-1.40

+6.33

GVI vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVI Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVI and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GVI vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVI drawdown since its inception was -12.93%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVI and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVIIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-53.30%

+40.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.79%

-53.30%

+51.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-48.95%

+48.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-17.71%

+15.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

33.14%

-32.46%

Volatility

GVI vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) is 0.81%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that GVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVIIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

10.89%

-10.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.93%

34.83%

-32.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49%

44.38%

-41.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.98%

49.92%

-45.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.53%

49.92%

-46.39%

GVI vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVI has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GVI vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

GVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GVI
iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF
3.63%3.48%3.40%2.75%1.86%1.46%1.84%2.29%2.16%1.91%1.77%1.75%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVI and IBIT have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (10.89%) compared to GVI (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVI dropped -12.93% vs IBIT's -53.30%.

On 1-year performance, GVI leads with 3.33% vs -46.35% for IBIT. On fees, GVI is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, GVI has been the lower-risk option at 0.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GVI has performed better with a 3.33% return vs -46.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GVI is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

GVI has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

GVI is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. GVI tracks Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Government/Credit Bond, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GVI and 0.25% for IBIT.

GVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVI and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer