PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GVAL vs. GAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GVAL vs. GAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GVAL achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly higher than GAA's 9.39% return. Over the past 10 years, GVAL has outperformed GAA with an annualized return of 10.76%, while GAA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.72% annualized return.


GVAL

1D
-1.24%
1M
3.64%
YTD
14.37%
6M
15.35%
1Y
39.69%
3Y*
26.42%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*
10.76%

GAA

1D
-0.66%
1M
1.35%
YTD
9.39%
6M
11.23%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
7.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GVAL vs. GAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GVAL
Cambria Global Value ETF
14.37%55.87%2.59%13.30%-7.98%10.70%-8.51%17.24%-14.30%29.50%
GAA
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
9.39%18.76%6.67%7.65%-8.47%11.17%9.11%15.12%-7.15%15.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GVAL and GAA is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2014

0.59

The correlation between GVAL and GAA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

GVAL vs. GAA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GVAL
GAA

Financial Services

16.4%
17.5%

Basic Materials

8.2%
9.7%

Energy

7.8%
13.2%

Real Estate

7.0%
13.9%

Technology

6.4%
8.7%

Communication Services

4.6%
4.0%

Utilities

4.1%
3.8%

Industrials

3.6%
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.6%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
3.5%

Healthcare

-

3.2%

Financial Services

GVAL
16.4%
GAA
17.5%

Basic Materials

GVAL
8.2%
GAA
9.7%

Energy

GVAL
7.8%
GAA
13.2%

Real Estate

GVAL
7.0%
GAA
13.9%

Technology

GVAL
6.4%
GAA
8.7%

Communication Services

GVAL
4.6%
GAA
4.0%

Utilities

GVAL
4.1%
GAA
3.8%

Industrials

GVAL
3.6%
GAA
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GVAL
2.6%
GAA
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

GVAL
1.9%
GAA
3.5%

Healthcare

GVAL

-

GAA
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GVAL vs. GAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GVAL
GVAL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
GVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
GVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

GAA
GAA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GVAL vs. GAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) and Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GVALGAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.46

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

3.93

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.33

15.04

-1.71

GVAL vs. GAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the GAA Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GVAL and GAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GVALGAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

2.48

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.57

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.70

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.63

-0.28

Drawdowns

GVAL vs. GAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.82%, which is greater than GAA's maximum drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GVAL and GAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GVALGAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.82%

-26.57%

-20.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-5.78%

-5.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.72%

-7.18%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

-18.47%

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.82%

-26.57%

-20.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-0.66%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-3.85%

-10.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

1.51%

+1.48%

Volatility

GVAL vs. GAA - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF (GAA) at 2.60%. This indicates that GVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GVALGAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

2.60%

+2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

7.41%

+5.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.52%

9.19%

+5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

11.28%

+7.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

11.09%

+8.12%

GVAL vs. GAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GVAL has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than GAA's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

GVAL vs. GAA - Dividend Comparison

GVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than GAA's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GAA
Cambria Global Asset Allocation ETF
3.59%4.24%3.88%3.73%6.05%4.21%2.73%3.32%3.01%2.36%2.82%2.49%
GVAL
Cambria Global Value ETF
2.83%2.93%4.75%6.12%5.05%2.97%1.90%2.84%4.65%2.00%2.54%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


GVAL and GAA have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GVAL has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to GAA (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GVAL dropped -46.82% vs GAA's -26.57%.

On 10-year performance, GVAL leads with 10.76% vs 7.72% for GAA. On fees, GAA is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, GAA has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GVAL has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 7.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GAA is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for GVAL.

GAA has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 2.83% for GVAL.

GVAL is categorized as Global Equities, while GAA is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for GVAL and 0.41% for GAA.

GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GVAL and GAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer