GUT vs. UTF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF).

GUT is managed by Gabelli Funds. It was launched on Feb 25, 1999.

Performance

GUT vs. UTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GUT vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GUT The Gabelli Utility Trust	2.84%	33.14%	6.01%	-21.07%	-1.10%	9.51%	13.19%	42.32%	-7.87%	22.98%
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	9.32%	9.93%	22.37%	-3.83%	-9.60%	17.91%	6.93%	42.74%	-9.87%	34.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUT achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, GUT has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 9.48%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.34% annualized return.

GUT

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 2.84%
• 6M: 4.72%
• 1Y: 25.41%
• 3Y*: 5.63%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 9.48%

UTF

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -3.86%
• YTD: 9.32%
• 6M: 8.34%
• 1Y: 10.91%
• 3Y*: 10.92%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: 11.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GUT vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUT

GUT Risk / Return Rank: 86
GUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
GUT Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GUT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

UTF

UTF Risk / Return Rank: 62
UTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
UTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
UTF Omega Ratio Rank: 58
UTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
UTF Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUT vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GUT	UTF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	0.70	+0.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	0.97	+1.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.14	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	0.99	+2.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.85	2.24	+11.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GUT vs. UTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUT Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the UTF Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUT and UTF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GUT	UTF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	0.70	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.34	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.49	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.44	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between GUT and UTF is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GUT vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison

GUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.92%, more than UTF's 7.13% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GUT The Gabelli Utility Trust	9.92%	9.95%	11.73%	11.07%	7.99%	7.28%	7.39%	7.72%	10.10%	8.45%	9.52%	10.53%
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc	7.13%	7.62%	7.74%	8.76%	7.75%	6.53%	7.20%	7.10%	10.12%	7.37%	10.51%	8.39%

Drawdowns

GUT vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUT drawdown since its inception was -52.79%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUT and UTF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GUT	UTF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.79%	-72.62%	+19.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.65%	-11.99%	+4.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.94%	-30.28%	-3.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.21%	-52.53%	+10.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-4.42%	+3.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.05%	-10.44%	+2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	5.29%	-3.48%

Volatility

GUT vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison

The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 4.56%. This indicates that GUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GUT	UTF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.04%	4.56%	+2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.47%	9.43%	+2.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.94%	15.70%	+1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.63%	18.51%	+3.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.77%	23.38%	+0.39%