GUT vs. SCHO

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GUT (The Gabelli Utility Trust) and SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both funds - GUT is a Utilities Equities fund managed by Gabelli, while SCHO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Over the past 10 years, GUT returned 9.25%/yr vs 1.72%/yr for SCHO. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GUT charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHO.

Performance

GUT vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUT achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than SCHO's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, GUT has outperformed SCHO with an annualized return of 9.25%, while SCHO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.

GUT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.06%
• 6M: 11.41%
• YTD: 11.38%
• 1Y: 16.67%
• 3Y*: 8.63%
• 5Y*: 5.18%
• 10Y*: 9.25%
• ALL TIME*: 7.32%

SCHO

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.04%
• 6M: 0.58%
• YTD: 0.79%
• 1Y: 2.63%
• 3Y*: 4.31%
• 5Y*: 1.87%
• 10Y*: 1.72%
• ALL TIME*: 1.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GUT The Gabelli Utility Trust	$1.44M	$1.84M	$1.53M
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	$59.23M	$61.44M	$84.14M

GUT vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GUT The Gabelli Utility Trust	11.38%	33.14%	6.01%	-21.07%	-1.10%	9.51%	13.19%	42.32%	-7.87%	22.98%
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	0.79%	5.49%	3.65%	4.31%	-3.87%	-0.64%	3.11%	3.47%	1.37%	0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GUT and SCHO is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010	0.04

The correlation between GUT and SCHO shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GUT vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GUT

GUT Risk / Return Rank: 38
GUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GUT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
GUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
GUT Martin Ratio Rank: 53

SCHO

SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 91
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GUT vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GUT	SCHO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	2.24	-1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	3.57	-2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.45	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	3.66	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.17	15.34	-8.17

GUT vs. SCHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUT Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the SCHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUT and SCHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GUT vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUT drawdown since its inception was -52.79%, which is greater than SCHO's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUT and SCHO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GUT	SCHO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.79%	-5.69%	-47.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.58%	-0.86%	-8.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.63%	-0.98%	-28.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.94%	-5.65%	-28.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.21%	-5.69%	-36.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.86%	-0.04%	-8.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.48%	-0.61%	-7.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	0.20%	+2.08%

Volatility

GUT vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison

The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT) has a higher volatility of 7.15% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.37%. This indicates that GUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GUT	SCHO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.15%	0.37%	+6.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.51%	1.03%	+11.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.06%	1.41%	+14.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.63%	2.00%	+19.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.83%	1.56%	+22.27%

GUT vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUT has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GUT vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison

GUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.45%, more than SCHO's 3.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GUT The Gabelli Utility Trust	9.45%	9.95%	11.73%	11.07%	7.99%	7.28%	7.39%	7.72%	10.10%	8.45%	9.52%	10.53%
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	3.53%	4.06%	4.29%	3.76%	1.34%	0.41%	1.27%	2.27%	1.60%	1.12%	0.82%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GUT and SCHO in my portfolio?

GUT and SCHO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GUT or SCHO?

GUT has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to SCHO (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUT dropped -52.79% vs SCHO's -5.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.