GUT vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
GUT is managed by Gabelli Funds. It was launched on Feb 25, 1999. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011.
Performance
GUT vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GUT vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUT The Gabelli Utility Trust | 2.84% | 33.14% | 6.01% | -21.07% | -1.10% | 9.51% | 13.19% | 42.32% | -7.87% | 22.98% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 12.79% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUT achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 12.79% return. Over the past 10 years, GUT has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 9.48%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.
GUT
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 4.72%
- 1Y
- 25.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.63%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.48%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- 12.79%
- 6M
- 14.49%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GUT vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUT has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GUT vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
GUT
SCHD
GUT vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GUT | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 0.89 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 1.35 | +0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.19 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 1.19 | +2.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.85 | 3.99 | +9.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUT | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 0.89 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.59 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.74 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.84 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between GUT and SCHD is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GUT vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
GUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.92%, more than SCHD's 3.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUT The Gabelli Utility Trust | 9.92% | 9.95% | 11.73% | 11.07% | 7.99% | 7.28% | 7.39% | 7.72% | 10.10% | 8.45% | 9.52% | 10.53% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.44% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Drawdowns
GUT vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUT drawdown since its inception was -52.79%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUT and SCHD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUT | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.79% | -33.37% | -19.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.65% | -12.74% | +5.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.94% | -16.85% | -17.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.21% | -33.37% | -8.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -2.89% | +1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -3.34% | -4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 3.89% | -2.08% |
Volatility
GUT vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.40%. This indicates that GUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GUT | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.04% | 2.40% | +4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 7.96% | +3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 15.74% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 14.40% | +7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.77% | 16.70% | +7.07% |