GUSH vs. OKTG
GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) and OKTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. GUSH is passively managed, while OKTG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. GUSH charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OKTG.
Performance
GUSH vs. OKTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 63.46% return, which is significantly lower than OKTG's 110.88% return.
GUSH
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- 12.19%
- 6M
- 54.37%
- YTD
- 63.46%
- 1Y
- 57.75%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 17.69%
- 10Y*
- -36.14%
OKTG
- 1D
- -4.61%
- 1M
- 54.71%
- 6M
- 88.98%
- YTD
- 110.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH vs. OKTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 63.46% | -11.31% |
OKTG Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF | 110.88% | 5.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSH and OKTG is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSH vs. OKTG — Risk / Return Rank
GUSH
OKTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GUSH vs. OKTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GUSH | OKTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GUSH vs. OKTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than OKTG's maximum drawdown of -60.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and OKTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSH | OKTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -60.69% | -39.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.80% | -9.20% | -90.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.96% | -22.77% | -70.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.71% | — | — |
Volatility
GUSH vs. OKTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSH | OKTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.34% | 133.12% | -76.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.75% | 133.12% | -65.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.95% | 133.12% | -40.17% |
GUSH vs. OKTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than OKTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSH vs. OKTG - Dividend Comparison
GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while OKTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.33% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
OKTG Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSH and OKTG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OKTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OKTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.
GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for OKTG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 0.75% for OKTG.
Find the right allocation for GUSH and OKTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer