GUSH vs. BSMW
GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) and BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GUSH is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%), while BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GUSH returned 6.88%/yr vs 2.88%/yr for BSMW. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. GUSH charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMW.
Performance
GUSH vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 42.54% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.38% return.
GUSH
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -19.15%
- YTD
- 42.54%
- 6M
- 41.51%
- 1Y
- 31.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- -37.01%
BSMW
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 2.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 42.54% | -19.39% | -12.73% | -0.55% |
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.38% | 3.42% | -0.35% | 7.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSH and BSMW is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2023 | -0.13 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GUSH and BSMW has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.13 to -0.35, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSH vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank
GUSH
BSMW
GUSH vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GUSH | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.47 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 2.13 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | 6.54 | -4.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GUSH vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and BSMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSH | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -7.57% | -92.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.18% | -2.92% | -33.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.59% | -7.34% | -56.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.83% | -0.90% | -98.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.92% | -1.71% | -91.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.77% | 0.95% | +12.82% |
Volatility
GUSH vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a higher volatility of 18.01% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.48%. This indicates that GUSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSH | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.01% | 0.48% | +17.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.07% | 1.95% | +42.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.58% | 2.68% | +53.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.20% | 4.96% | +63.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.43% | 4.96% | +88.47% |
GUSH vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSH vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison
GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than BSMW's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.48% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.75% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSH and BSMW have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GUSH has higher volatility (18.01%) compared to BSMW (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs BSMW's -7.57%.
On 3-year performance, GUSH leads with 6.88% vs 2.88% for BSMW. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GUSH has performed better with a 6.88% return vs 2.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.
BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 1.75% for GUSH.
GUSH is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%), while BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 0.18% for BSMW.
BSMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GUSH and BSMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer