PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSH vs. AVSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSH vs. AVSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF (AVSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSH achieves a 61.12% return, which is significantly higher than AVSF's 0.45% return.


GUSH

1D
8.20%
1M
-0.04%
6M
58.37%
YTD
61.12%
1Y
40.88%
3Y*
7.35%
5Y*
14.49%
10Y*
-36.14%

AVSF

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.15%
6M
0.48%
YTD
0.45%
1Y
3.40%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
1.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSH vs. AVSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
61.12%-19.39%-12.73%-7.23%66.47%129.94%63.54%
AVSF
Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF
0.45%6.57%3.81%5.25%-5.52%-1.17%0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSH and AVSF is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020

-0.07

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GUSH and AVSF has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.31, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSH vs. AVSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

AVSF
AVSF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AVSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVSF Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AVSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVSF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSH vs. AVSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) and Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF (AVSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GUSHAVSFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.33

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

2.41

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

8.67

-6.03

GUSH vs. AVSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSH Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the AVSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSH and AVSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GUSH vs. AVSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSH drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than AVSF's maximum drawdown of -8.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSH and AVSF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSHAVSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-8.85%

-91.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.18%

-1.42%

-34.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.59%

-1.42%

-62.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.64%

-8.85%

-64.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.80%

-0.53%

-99.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.95%

-2.17%

-90.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.67%

0.39%

+15.28%

Volatility

GUSH vs. AVSF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a higher volatility of 16.88% compared to Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF (AVSF) at 0.67%. This indicates that GUSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSHAVSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.88%

0.67%

+16.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.38%

1.47%

+42.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.64%

1.92%

+54.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.01%

2.67%

+65.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.98%

2.52%

+90.46%

GUSH vs. AVSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSH has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than AVSF's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUSH vs. AVSF - Dividend Comparison

GUSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than AVSF's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AVSF
Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF
4.38%4.31%4.34%3.93%1.78%0.48%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.35%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUSH and AVSF have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GUSH has higher volatility (16.88%) compared to AVSF (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSH dropped -99.98% vs AVSF's -8.85%.

On 5-year performance, GUSH leads with 14.49% vs 1.84% for AVSF. On fees, AVSF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVSF has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GUSH has performed better with a 14.49% return vs 1.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVSF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

AVSF has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 1.35% for GUSH.

GUSH is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AVSF is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for GUSH and 0.15% for AVSF.

AVSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSH and AVSF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer