GUSE vs. XLE
GUSE (Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GUSE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. GUSE is actively managed, while XLE is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. GUSE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
GUSE vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 28.66% return.
GUSE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- YTD
- 11.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- YTD
- 28.66%
- 1Y
- 31.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.32%
- 5Y*
- 21.79%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
GUSE vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 11.48% | 2.38% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.66% | -2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSE and XLE is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSE vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
GUSE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLE
GUSE vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GUSE | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GUSE vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSE | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -71.26% | +62.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -8.65% | +7.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -17.95% | +16.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.53% | — |
Volatility
GUSE vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSE | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 21.06% | -7.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 25.95% | -12.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 29.58% | -15.63% |
GUSE vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSE vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than XLE's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.67% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUSE and XLE have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for GUSE.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.65% for GUSE.
GUSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.08% for XLE.
Find the right allocation for GUSE and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer