GUSE vs. SCHX
GUSE (Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GUSE is actively managed, while SCHX is passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GUSE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
GUSE vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 10.34% return.
GUSE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- YTD
- 11.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 8.09%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.02%
GUSE vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 11.48% | 2.38% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.34% | 1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUSE and SCHX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUSE vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
GUSE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHX
GUSE vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GUSE | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.98 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GUSE vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUSE | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -34.33% | +25.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -1.04% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -3.95% | +2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility
GUSE vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUSE | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 12.69% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 17.24% | -3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.95% | 18.14% | -4.19% |
GUSE vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GUSE vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than SCHX's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, GUSE and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for GUSE.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.65% for GUSE.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.03% for SCHX.
Find the right allocation for GUSE and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer