PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSE vs. RSBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSE vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 19.39% return.


GUSE

1D
-0.79%
1M
0.84%
6M
8.88%
YTD
10.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSBY

1D
0.32%
1M
1.01%
6M
19.51%
YTD
19.39%
1Y
18.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSE vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GUSE and RSBY is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSE vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


RSBY
RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSE vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GUSERSBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.30

GUSE vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GUSE vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and RSBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSERSBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-23.32%

+14.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-5.76%

+4.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.40%

-13.27%

+11.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

Volatility

GUSE vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSERSBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

11.40%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

13.33%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.87%

13.33%

+0.54%

GUSE vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUSE vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than RSBY's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GUSE
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF
0.66%0.73%0.00%
RSBY
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
1.73%2.07%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUSE and RSBY have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GUSE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GUSE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.66% for GUSE.

GUSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.98% for RSBY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSE and RSBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer