GUSE vs. DJUN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

GUSE (Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF) and DJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - GUSE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while DJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index. GUSE is actively managed, while DJUN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GUSE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DJUN.

Performance

GUSE vs. DJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than DJUN's 4.39% return.

GUSE

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 9.66%
• YTD: 11.29%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

DJUN

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 3.79%
• YTD: 4.39%
• 1Y: 9.38%
• 3Y*: 10.46%
• 5Y*: 7.98%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June	$1.26M	$1.81M	$2.13M
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF	$364.55K	$258.31K	$277.29K

GUSE vs. DJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF	11.29%	2.38%
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June	4.39%	1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSE and DJUN is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

GUSE vs. DJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GUSE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DJUN

DJUN Risk / Return Rank: 86
DJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
DJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
DJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
DJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GUSE vs. DJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GUSE	DJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.89	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.85	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.41	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.29	—

Drawdowns

GUSE vs. DJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, smaller than the maximum DJUN drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and DJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GUSE	DJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.54%	-11.96%	+3.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.15%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.96%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-0.35%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.41%	-1.56%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GUSE	DJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.83%	4.74%	+9.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.83%	8.54%	+5.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.83%	7.99%	+5.84%

GUSE vs. DJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

GUSE vs. DJUN - Dividend Comparison

GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while DJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%
GUSE Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF	0.65%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GUSE and DJUN in my portfolio?

GUSE and DJUN have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GUSE or DJUN?

On fees, GUSE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GUSE or DJUN?

GUSE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GUSE or DJUN?

GUSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for DJUN.

What is the main difference between GUSE and DJUN?

GUSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.85% for DJUN.