PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSE vs. BUFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUSE vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSE achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.


GUSE

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.49%
YTD
11.62%
6M
11.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.75%
YTD
2.45%
6M
2.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSE vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GUSE and BUFH is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUSE vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF (GUSE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GUSE vs. BUFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUSEBUFHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.16

2.91

-0.75

Drawdowns

GUSE vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSE drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSE and BUFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSEBUFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-1.53%

-7.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.05%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.34%

-0.18%

-1.16%

Volatility

GUSE vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUSEBUFHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

2.37%

+11.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.73%

2.37%

+11.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.73%

2.37%

+11.36%

GUSE vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUSE vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

GUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


GUSE and BUFH have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GUSE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GUSE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

GUSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

GUSE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GUSE and 0.95% for BUFH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUSE and BUFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer