GUSA vs. SIXA

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

GUSA (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF) and SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GUSA is passively managed, while SIXA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GUSA returned 19.12%/yr vs 19.82%/yr for SIXA. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GUSA charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for SIXA.

Performance

GUSA vs. SIXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSA achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly lower than SIXA's 14.31% return.

GUSA

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 0.60%
• 6M: 7.79%
• YTD: 9.56%
• 1Y: 19.31%
• 3Y*: 19.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SIXA

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 1.27%
• 6M: 11.64%
• YTD: 14.31%
• 1Y: 18.72%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 12.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUSA vs. SIXA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF	9.56%	17.51%	24.46%	26.61%	-12.69%
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF	14.31%	15.52%	22.70%	11.98%	-3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between GUSA and SIXA is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between GUSA and SIXA has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GUSA vs. SIXA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GUSA	SIXA
Technology	37.4%	19.2%
Financial Services	10.8%	7.7%
Communication Services	10.4%	13.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	3.9%
Industrials	9.0%	6.5%
Healthcare	8.6%	14.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	23.2%
Energy	3.2%	4.8%
Utilities	2.1%	5.0%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.3%
Basic Materials	2.0%	-

Return for Risk

GUSA vs. SIXA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSA

GUSA Risk / Return Rank: 59
GUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
GUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
GUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
GUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 69

SIXA

SIXA Risk / Return Rank: 83
SIXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
SIXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
SIXA Omega Ratio Rank: 80
SIXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SIXA Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSA vs. SIXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GUSA	SIXA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.12	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	3.18	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.37	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	3.37	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.36	12.75	-3.39

GUSA vs. SIXA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the SIXA Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSA and SIXA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GUSA vs. SIXA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSA drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, which is greater than SIXA's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSA and SIXA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GUSA	SIXA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.61%	-18.38%	-1.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.01%	-5.59%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.61%	-11.22%	-8.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.77%	-0.40%	-1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.31%	-2.95%	-1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	1.47%	+0.60%

Volatility

GUSA vs. SIXA - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.35% compared to 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) at 2.44%. This indicates that GUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GUSA	SIXA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.35%	2.44%	+0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.18%	6.98%	+3.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.84%	8.88%	+3.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.20%	12.78%	+4.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	13.28%	+3.92%

GUSA vs. SIXA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSA has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXA's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

GUSA vs. SIXA - Dividend Comparison

GUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than SIXA's 2.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GUSA Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. 1000 Equity ETF	0.99%	0.99%	1.16%	1.36%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF	2.00%	2.31%	1.62%	2.12%	2.23%	1.63%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GUSA and SIXA in my portfolio?

GUSA and SIXA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GUSA or SIXA?

GUSA has higher volatility (3.35%) compared to SIXA (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUSA dropped -19.61% vs SIXA's -18.38%.

Which ETF is better, GUSA or SIXA?

On 3-year performance, SIXA leads with 19.82% vs 19.12% for GUSA. On fees, GUSA is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SIXA has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GUSA or SIXA?

Over the 3-year period, SIXA has performed better with a 19.82% return vs 19.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GUSA or SIXA?

GUSA is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GUSA or SIXA?

SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.99% for GUSA.

What is the main difference between GUSA and SIXA?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for GUSA and 0.86% for SIXA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIXA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.