GURU vs. XMLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GURU (Global X Guru Index ETF) and XMLV (Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GURU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive Guru Index, while XMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GURU returned 12.16%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for XMLV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GURU charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XMLV.

Performance

GURU vs. XMLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GURU achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly higher than XMLV's 2.54% return. Over the past 10 years, GURU has outperformed XMLV with an annualized return of 12.16%, while XMLV has yielded a comparatively lower 7.60% annualized return.

GURU

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 3.20%
• YTD: 7.06%
• 6M: 6.09%
• 1Y: 27.98%
• 3Y*: 23.93%
• 5Y*: 7.41%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

XMLV

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -2.36%
• YTD: 2.54%
• 6M: 2.22%
• 1Y: 5.54%
• 3Y*: 10.18%
• 5Y*: 5.52%
• 10Y*: 7.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GURU vs. XMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF	7.06%	25.43%	23.76%	19.28%	-27.94%	8.19%	25.27%	30.99%	-6.56%	24.26%
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF	2.54%	5.55%	17.08%	1.86%	-6.55%	23.00%	-8.42%	23.77%	-0.16%	13.72%

Correlation

The correlation between GURU and XMLV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2013	0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between GURU and XMLV has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GURU vs. XMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GURU	XMLV
Technology	25.2%	1.0%
Healthcare	23.5%	2.9%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	3.3%
Industrials	10.6%	9.7%
Financial Services	9.4%	21.6%
Utilities	5.4%	20.0%
Communication Services	5.3%	1.0%
Energy	4.3%	3.9%
Basic Materials	2.1%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.9%	4.7%
Real Estate	1.2%	30.8%

Return for Risk

GURU vs. XMLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GURU

GURU Risk / Return Rank: 52
GURU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
GURU Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
GURU Omega Ratio Rank: 50
GURU Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GURU Martin Ratio Rank: 54

XMLV

XMLV Risk / Return Rank: 18
XMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
XMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 15
XMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
XMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GURU vs. XMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GURU	XMLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	0.54	+1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	0.83	+1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.09	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	0.79	+1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.12	2.66	+6.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GURU vs. XMLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GURU Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the XMLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GURU and XMLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GURU	XMLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	0.54	+1.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.38	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.45	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.60	+0.05

Drawdowns

GURU vs. XMLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GURU drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, roughly equal to the maximum XMLV drawdown of -39.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURU and XMLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	GURU	XMLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.50%	-39.86%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.22%	-7.03%	-4.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.73%	-13.80%	-6.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.50%	-16.53%	-21.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.50%	-39.86%	+1.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-4.89%	+3.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.67%	-4.26%	-4.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	2.09%	+0.98%

Volatility

GURU vs. XMLV - Volatility Comparison

Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) at 3.06%. This indicates that GURU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GURU	XMLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	3.06%	+1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.20%	7.34%	+4.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.56%	10.35%	+5.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.43%	14.46%	+5.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.16%	16.97%	+3.19%

GURU vs. XMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GURU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XMLV's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

GURU vs. XMLV - Dividend Comparison

GURU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than XMLV's 2.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF	0.11%	0.11%	0.17%	0.57%	0.22%	0.09%	2.75%	0.35%	0.54%	0.54%	0.22%	0.47%
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF	2.91%	2.87%	2.23%	2.34%	2.05%	1.14%	1.93%	2.02%	2.13%	1.74%	1.72%	1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GURU and XMLV in my portfolio?

GURU and XMLV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GURU or XMLV?

GURU has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to XMLV (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GURU dropped -38.50% vs XMLV's -39.86%.

Which ETF is better, GURU or XMLV?

On 10-year performance, GURU leads with 12.16% vs 7.60% for XMLV. On fees, XMLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GURU or XMLV?

Over the 10-year period, GURU has performed better with a 12.16% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GURU or XMLV?

XMLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GURU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GURU or XMLV?

XMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.11% for GURU.

What is the main difference between GURU and XMLV?

GURU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XMLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. GURU tracks Solactive Guru Index, while XMLV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GURU and 0.25% for XMLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GURU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.