PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GURU vs. HDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GURU vs. HDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GURU achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly higher than HDG's 6.40% return. Over the past 10 years, GURU has outperformed HDG with an annualized return of 12.16%, while HDG has yielded a comparatively lower 3.91% annualized return.


GURU

1D
-0.12%
1M
3.20%
YTD
7.06%
6M
6.09%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
23.93%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
12.16%

HDG

1D
-0.37%
1M
2.07%
YTD
6.40%
6M
7.00%
1Y
13.22%
3Y*
7.56%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
3.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GURU vs. HDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GURU
Global X Guru Index ETF
7.06%25.43%23.76%19.28%-27.94%8.19%25.27%30.99%-6.56%24.26%
HDG
ProShares Hedge Replication
6.40%7.18%5.12%7.14%-8.48%2.97%7.45%9.58%-4.52%5.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GURU and HDG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2012

0.74

The correlation between GURU and HDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

GURU vs. HDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GURU
HDG

Technology

25.2%
17.0%

Healthcare

23.5%
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
8.4%

Industrials

10.6%
17.7%

Financial Services

9.4%
15.8%

Utilities

5.4%
2.9%

Communication Services

5.3%
2.4%

Energy

4.3%
6.1%

Basic Materials

2.1%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.2%
6.1%

Technology

GURU
25.2%
HDG
17.0%

Healthcare

GURU
23.5%
HDG
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

GURU
11.0%
HDG
8.4%

Industrials

GURU
10.6%
HDG
17.7%

Financial Services

GURU
9.4%
HDG
15.8%

Utilities

GURU
5.4%
HDG
2.9%

Communication Services

GURU
5.3%
HDG
2.4%

Energy

GURU
4.3%
HDG
6.1%

Basic Materials

GURU
2.1%
HDG
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

GURU
1.9%
HDG
2.4%

Real Estate

GURU
1.2%
HDG
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GURU vs. HDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GURU
GURU Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
GURU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GURU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GURU Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GURU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GURU Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

HDG
HDG Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GURU vs. HDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GURUHDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

2.36

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.57

3.50

-0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.35

-0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.12

13.81

-4.69

GURU vs. HDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GURU Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the HDG Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GURU and HDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GURUHDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.36

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.42

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.55

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.43

+0.21

Drawdowns

GURU vs. HDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GURU drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than HDG's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURU and HDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GURUHDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.50%

-15.31%

-23.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.22%

-3.97%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.73%

-7.20%

-13.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.50%

-15.31%

-23.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

-15.31%

-23.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-0.37%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-2.77%

-5.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

0.96%

+2.11%

Volatility

GURU vs. HDG - Volatility Comparison

Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) at 2.06%. This indicates that GURU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GURUHDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

2.06%

+2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

4.58%

+7.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

5.64%

+9.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

7.15%

+13.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.16%

7.11%

+13.05%

GURU vs. HDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GURU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HDG's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

GURU vs. HDG - Dividend Comparison

GURU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than HDG's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GURU
Global X Guru Index ETF
0.11%0.11%0.17%0.57%0.22%0.09%2.75%0.35%0.54%0.54%0.22%0.47%
HDG
ProShares Hedge Replication
2.35%2.55%3.50%3.48%0.39%0.00%0.08%1.09%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GURU and HDG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GURU has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to HDG (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GURU dropped -38.50% vs HDG's -15.31%.

On 10-year performance, GURU leads with 12.16% vs 3.91% for HDG. On fees, GURU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HDG has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GURU has performed better with a 12.16% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GURU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for HDG.

HDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.11% for GURU.

GURU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HDG is Long-Short. GURU tracks Solactive Guru Index, while HDG tracks Merrill Lynch Factor Model - Exchange Series. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GURU and 0.95% for HDG.

HDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GURU and HDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer