PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GURU vs. JOET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GURU vs. JOET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GURU having a 8.03% return and JOET slightly lower at 8.02%.


GURU

1D
0.91%
1M
3.41%
YTD
8.03%
6M
6.41%
1Y
28.88%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
12.17%

JOET

1D
0.55%
1M
5.41%
YTD
8.02%
6M
7.19%
1Y
14.92%
3Y*
19.04%
5Y*
11.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GURU vs. JOET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GURU
Global X Guru Index ETF
8.03%25.43%23.76%19.28%-27.94%8.19%7.21%
JOET
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF
8.02%11.89%24.01%16.34%-18.04%26.79%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GURU and JOET is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020

0.85

The correlation between GURU and JOET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

GURU vs. JOET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GURU
JOET

Technology

25.2%
23.1%

Healthcare

23.5%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
10.3%

Industrials

10.6%
22.6%

Financial Services

9.4%
15.1%

Utilities

5.4%
0.8%

Communication Services

5.3%
4.0%

Energy

4.3%
5.8%

Basic Materials

2.1%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.4%

Technology

GURU
25.2%
JOET
23.1%

Healthcare

GURU
23.5%
JOET
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GURU
11.0%
JOET
10.3%

Industrials

GURU
10.6%
JOET
22.6%

Financial Services

GURU
9.4%
JOET
15.1%

Utilities

GURU
5.4%
JOET
0.8%

Communication Services

GURU
5.3%
JOET
4.0%

Energy

GURU
4.3%
JOET
5.8%

Basic Materials

GURU
2.1%
JOET
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

GURU
1.9%
JOET
1.6%

Real Estate

GURU
1.2%
JOET
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GURU vs. JOET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GURU
GURU Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
GURU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GURU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GURU Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GURU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GURU Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

JOET
JOET Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
JOET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JOET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JOET Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
JOET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
JOET Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GURU vs. JOET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GURUJOETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.20

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

1.44

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

5.52

+3.89

GURU vs. JOET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GURU Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the JOET Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GURU and JOET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GURUJOETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.11

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.62

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.72

-0.07

Drawdowns

GURU vs. JOET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GURU drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than JOET's maximum drawdown of -26.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURU and JOET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GURUJOETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.50%

-26.58%

-11.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.22%

-10.42%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.73%

-19.55%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.50%

-26.58%

-11.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

0.00%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-7.18%

-1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.71%

+0.36%

Volatility

GURU vs. JOET - Volatility Comparison

Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) at 3.46%. This indicates that GURU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JOET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GURUJOETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

3.46%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.22%

10.38%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.55%

13.45%

+2.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

17.70%

+2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.16%

17.52%

+2.64%

GURU vs. JOET - Expense Ratio Comparison

GURU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than JOET's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GURU vs. JOET - Dividend Comparison

GURU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than JOET's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GURU
Global X Guru Index ETF
0.11%0.11%0.17%0.57%0.22%0.09%2.75%0.35%0.54%0.54%0.22%0.47%
JOET
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF
0.61%0.65%0.71%1.32%1.25%0.42%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GURU and JOET have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GURU has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to JOET (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GURU dropped -38.50% vs JOET's -26.58%.

On 5-year performance, JOET leads with 11.01% vs 7.61% for GURU. On fees, JOET is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JOET has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JOET has performed better with a 11.01% return vs 7.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JOET is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GURU.

JOET has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.11% for GURU.

GURU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while JOET is Momentum. GURU tracks Solactive Guru Index, while JOET tracks Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GURU and 0.29% for JOET.

GURU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GURU and JOET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer