GURIX vs. VTMFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX).
GURIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 28, 2014. VTMFX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 6, 1994.
Performance
GURIX vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GURIX vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURIX Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund | 1.81% | 2.04% | 4.96% | 13.01% | -23.81% | 42.07% | 1.76% | 25.54% | -3.97% | 10.22% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | -2.15% | 11.28% | 12.17% | 15.55% | -12.69% | 13.10% | 13.31% | 18.01% | -1.40% | 12.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GURIX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than VTMFX's -2.15% return. Over the past 10 years, GURIX has underperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 6.64%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.97% annualized return.
GURIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -7.51%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- -0.64%
- 1Y
- 2.68%
- 3Y*
- 6.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 6.64%
VTMFX
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- -2.15%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 10.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 7.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GURIX vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GURIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GURIX vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank
GURIX
VTMFX
GURIX vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GURIX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 1.34 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 1.94 | -1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.29 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 1.73 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | 8.12 | -6.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GURIX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 1.34 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.73 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.88 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.82 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between GURIX and VTMFX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GURIX vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison
GURIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than VTMFX's 2.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURIX Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund | 2.22% | 2.40% | 5.18% | 3.07% | 6.79% | 5.60% | 7.81% | 6.25% | 3.05% | 5.37% | 4.52% | 16.81% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 2.28% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 1.94% | 1.85% | 1.38% | 1.72% | 2.05% | 2.22% | 2.00% | 2.13% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
GURIX vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GURIX drawdown since its inception was -33.32%, which is greater than VTMFX's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURIX and VTMFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GURIX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.32% | -28.49% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.37% | -6.82% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.30% | -17.40% | -12.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.32% | -21.87% | -11.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.93% | -4.00% | -3.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.00% | -3.57% | -4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 1.45% | +1.33% |
Volatility
GURIX vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 2.86%. This indicates that GURIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GURIX | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 2.86% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.59% | 4.82% | +3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 8.55% | +6.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 8.51% | +8.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 9.10% | +8.87% |