GTTTX vs. SLYV
GTTTX (Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class) and SLYV (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. GTTTX is actively managed, while SLYV is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GTTTX returned 15.05%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for SLYV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GTTTX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYV.
Performance
GTTTX vs. SLYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTTTX achieves a 22.39% return, which is significantly higher than SLYV's 17.46% return. Over the past 10 years, GTTTX has outperformed SLYV with an annualized return of 15.05%, while SLYV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.61% annualized return.
GTTTX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 22.39%
- 6M
- 20.24%
- 1Y
- 46.43%
- 3Y*
- 32.58%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
SLYV
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 17.46%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 37.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
GTTTX vs. SLYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTTTX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class | 22.39% | 12.83% | 45.27% | 17.37% | -13.66% | 32.94% | 0.21% | 23.37% | -10.83% | 7.34% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 17.46% | 6.54% | 7.28% | 14.82% | -11.08% | 30.57% | 2.68% | 24.26% | -12.77% | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTTTX and SLYV is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.96 |
The correlation between GTTTX and SLYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTTTX vs. SLYV — Risk / Return Rank
GTTTX
SLYV
GTTTX vs. SLYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTTTX | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.35 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.34 | 4.01 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.78 | 13.30 | +5.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTTTX vs. SLYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTTTX drawdown since its inception was -56.58%, smaller than the maximum SLYV drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTTTX and SLYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTTTX | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.58% | -61.15% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -9.36% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.29% | -28.68% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.29% | -28.68% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.29% | -47.73% | +0.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.68% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.91% | -8.93% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.82% | -0.23% |
Volatility
GTTTX vs. SLYV - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) at 4.76%. This indicates that GTTTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTTTX | SLYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 4.76% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 11.74% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.69% | 18.28% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.35% | 21.91% | +13.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.84% | 23.94% | +6.90% |
GTTTX vs. SLYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTTTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTTTX vs. SLYV - Dividend Comparison
GTTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, more than SLYV's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTTTX Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class | 6.86% | 8.39% | 52.07% | 1.87% | 3.85% | 40.18% | 0.90% | 0.90% | 12.37% | 11.87% | 4.51% | 7.00% |
SLYV SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 2.11% | 1.47% | 1.94% | 1.40% | 1.67% | 2.14% | 5.53% | 2.18% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GTTTX and SLYV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GTTTX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to SLYV (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTTTX dropped -56.58% vs SLYV's -61.15%.
GTTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTTTX and SLYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer