PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTTTX vs. VRTVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTTTX vs. VRTVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GTTTX having a 25.32% return and VRTVX slightly lower at 24.78%. Over the past 10 years, GTTTX has outperformed VRTVX with an annualized return of 14.32%, while VRTVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.33% annualized return.


GTTTX

1D
1.79%
1M
2.03%
6M
14.63%
YTD
25.32%
1Y
45.13%
3Y*
29.79%
5Y*
17.90%
10Y*
14.32%
ALL TIME*
10.96%

VRTVX

1D
1.43%
1M
1.44%
6M
14.51%
YTD
24.78%
1Y
43.10%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
10.33%
ALL TIME*
10.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GTTTX vs. VRTVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTTTX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class
25.32%12.83%45.27%17.37%-13.66%32.94%0.21%23.37%-10.83%7.34%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
24.78%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%28.06%4.81%22.40%-12.83%7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GTTTX and VRTVX is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.99

The correlation between GTTTX and VRTVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTTTX vs. VRTVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTTTX
GTTTX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
GTTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GTTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTTTX vs. VRTVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTTTXVRTVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.30

5.37

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.37

19.49

-0.12

GTTTX vs. VRTVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the VRTVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTTTX and VRTVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTTTX vs. VRTVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTTTX drawdown since its inception was -56.58%, which is greater than VRTVX's maximum drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTTTX and VRTVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTTTXVRTVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.58%

-45.98%

-10.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-8.54%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.29%

-26.85%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.29%

-26.85%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.29%

-45.98%

-1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.86%

-7.70%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.35%

+0.15%

Volatility

GTTTX vs. VRTVX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class (GTTTX) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) at 3.46%. This indicates that GTTTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRTVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTTTXVRTVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

3.46%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.36%

12.01%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

17.45%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.23%

21.49%

+13.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.78%

23.66%

+7.12%

GTTTX vs. VRTVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTTTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTTTX vs. VRTVX - Dividend Comparison

GTTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than VRTVX's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTTTX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Insights Fund Investor Class
6.70%8.39%52.07%1.87%3.85%40.18%0.90%0.90%12.37%11.87%4.51%7.00%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.60%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, GTTTX and VRTVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GTTTX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to VRTVX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTTTX dropped -56.58% vs VRTVX's -45.98%.

GTTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTTTX and VRTVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer