GTPE vs. WBIF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GTPE (Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. GTPE is passively managed, while WBIF is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTPE charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for WBIF.

Performance

GTPE vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF (GTPE) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTPE achieves a 19.04% return, which is significantly higher than WBIF's 12.01% return.

GTPE

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 7.59%
• YTD: 19.04%
• 6M: 20.31%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WBIF

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: 12.01%
• 6M: 11.33%
• 1Y: 23.76%
• 3Y*: 9.09%
• 5Y*: 2.46%
• 10Y*: 5.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTPE vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GTPE Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF	19.04%	2.66%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	12.01%	-0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GTPE and WBIF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

GTPE vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 64
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 58
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTPE vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF (GTPE) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTPE	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.29	0.31	+1.98

Drawdowns

GTPE vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTPE drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, smaller than the maximum WBIF drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTPE and WBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTPE	WBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.91%	-20.29%	+11.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.60%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-0.61%	+0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-7.73%	+6.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GTPE	WBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.17%	12.29%	+4.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.17%	12.86%	+4.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.17%	12.34%	+4.83%

GTPE vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTPE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTPE vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

GTPE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTPE Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.06%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTPE and WBIF in my portfolio?

GTPE and WBIF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GTPE or WBIF?

On fees, GTPE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTPE or WBIF?

GTPE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTPE or WBIF?

WBIF has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for GTPE.

What is the main difference between GTPE and WBIF?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GTPE and 1.25% for WBIF.