PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTOQ vs. PHYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTOQ vs. PHYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF (GTOQ) and Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GTOQ

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.26%
6M
1.10%
YTD
1.80%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.19%

PHYD

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$55.75K$50.01K$1.37M

GTOQ vs. PHYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GTOQ
Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
1.80%8.04%8.13%9.69%
PHYD
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -
2.32%8.84%7.35%8.30%

Correlation

The correlation between GTOQ and PHYD is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2023

0.79

The correlation between GTOQ and PHYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTOQ vs. PHYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTOQ
GTOQ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
GTOQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTOQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTOQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GTOQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTOQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTOQ vs. PHYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF (GTOQ) and Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTOQPHYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.87

GTOQ vs. PHYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTOQ vs. PHYD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTOQPHYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

Volatility

GTOQ vs. PHYD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTOQPHYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.46%

GTOQ vs. PHYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTOQ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PHYD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTOQ vs. PHYD - Dividend Comparison

GTOQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, while PHYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GTOQ
Invesco High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
6.88%7.04%7.20%6.76%6.17%4.86%
PHYD
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -
8.00%6.63%6.80%6.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTOQ and PHYD have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GTOQ is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GTOQ is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PHYD.

PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 8.00%, compared with 6.88% for GTOQ.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GTOQ and 0.55% for PHYD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTOQ and PHYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer