GTOP vs. ASMH
GTOP (Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. GTOP is actively managed, while ASMH is passively managed. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GTOP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.
Performance
GTOP vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTOP achieves a 19.25% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 56.41% return.
GTOP
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- YTD
- 19.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ASMH
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -8.15%
- 6M
- 18.92%
- YTD
- 56.41%
- 1Y
- 140.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 105.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $131.16K | $380.41K | $302.79K | |
| $535.54K | $741.71K | $641.89K |
GTOP vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GTOP Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF | 19.25% | -1.02% |
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 56.41% | -3.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTOP and ASMH is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTOP vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank
GTOP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ASMH
GTOP vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF (GTOP) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTOP | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 23.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTOP vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTOP drawdown since its inception was -14.47%, smaller than the maximum ASMH drawdown of -21.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOP and ASMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTOP | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.47% | -21.52% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -18.35% | +11.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.76% | -4.74% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.86% | — |
Volatility
GTOP vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTOP | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.04% | 43.72% | -18.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 41.65% | -16.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 41.65% | -16.61% |
GTOP vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTOP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTOP vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison
GTOP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 1.96% | 0.19% |
GTOP Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTOP and ASMH have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GTOP.
ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for GTOP.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GTOP and 0.19% for ASMH.
Find the right allocation for GTOP and ASMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer