GTOP vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GTOP (Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTOP is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. GTOP is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTOP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

GTOP vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF (GTOP) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTOP achieves a 20.78% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return.

GTOP

• 1D: -3.08%
• 1M: 1.37%
• YTD: 20.78%
• 6M: 19.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMH

• 1D: -7.01%
• 1M: 7.93%
• YTD: 72.73%
• 6M: 71.29%
• 1Y: 138.23%
• 3Y*: 62.28%
• 5Y*: 38.18%
• 10Y*: 37.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTOP vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GTOP Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF	20.78%	-1.02%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	72.73%	-0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GTOP and SMH is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

GTOP vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTOP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 94
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTOP vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF (GTOP) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GTOP	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.99	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.05	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.58	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	9.31	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	33.88	—

Drawdowns

GTOP vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTOP drawdown since its inception was -14.47%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOP and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTOP	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.47%	-84.96%	+70.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.93%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.56%	-7.01%	+1.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.45%	-41.01%	+37.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GTOP	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.08%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	29.18%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.61%	34.87%	-10.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.61%	35.83%	-11.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.61%	32.97%	-8.36%

GTOP vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTOP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTOP vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

GTOP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTOP Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.18%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTOP and SMH in my portfolio?

GTOP and SMH have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GTOP or SMH?

On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTOP or SMH?

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GTOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTOP or SMH?

SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for GTOP.

What is the main difference between GTOP and SMH?

GTOP is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GTOP and 0.35% for SMH.