GTOP vs. SMH
GTOP (Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTOP is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. GTOP is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTOP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
GTOP vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTOP achieves a 26.56% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return.
GTOP
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 13.91%
- YTD
- 26.56%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
GTOP vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GTOP Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF | 26.56% | -1.21% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | -1.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTOP and SMH is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTOP vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
GTOP
SMH
GTOP vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF (GTOP) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTOP | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.61 | 0.34 | +2.27 |
Drawdowns
GTOP vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTOP drawdown since its inception was -14.47%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOP and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTOP | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.47% | -84.96% | +70.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | 0.00% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | -41.09% | +37.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility
GTOP vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTOP | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.75% | 30.56% | -7.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 35.01% | -12.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 32.57% | -9.82% |
GTOP vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTOP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTOP vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
GTOP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTOP Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTOP and SMH have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GTOP.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for GTOP.
GTOP is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GTOP and 0.35% for SMH.
Find the right allocation for GTOP and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer