GTOP vs. ARMH
GTOP (Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GTOP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.
Performance
GTOP vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GTOP
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- YTD
- 19.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ARMH
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -23.97%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $194.56K | $502.72K | $705.34K | |
| $535.54K | $741.71K | $641.89K |
GTOP vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GTOP Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF | -1.36% |
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -22.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTOP and ARMH is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTOP vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF (GTOP) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTOP vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTOP drawdown since its inception was -14.47%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -48.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOP and ARMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTOP | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.47% | -48.81% | +34.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -45.80% | +39.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.76% | -23.00% | +19.24% |
Volatility
GTOP vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTOP | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.04% | 99.09% | -74.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 99.09% | -74.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 99.09% | -74.05% |
GTOP vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTOP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTOP vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison
Neither GTOP nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GTOP and ARMH have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GTOP.
GTOP and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GTOP and 0.19% for ARMH.
Find the right allocation for GTOP and ARMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer