GTO vs. UGA
GTO (Invesco Total Return Bond ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - GTO is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Invesco, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. GTO is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GTO returned 2.93%/yr vs 14.43%/yr for UGA. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. GTO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
GTO vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTO achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.49% return. Over the past 10 years, GTO has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 2.93%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.43% annualized return.
GTO
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 6.41%
- 3Y*
- 4.86%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
UGA
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -12.35%
- YTD
- 75.49%
- 6M
- 64.35%
- 1Y
- 80.94%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 25.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.43%
GTO vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | 0.68% | 7.17% | 2.63% | 5.95% | -14.77% | -0.38% | 10.86% | 11.65% | -0.26% | 7.41% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 75.49% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTO and UGA is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2016 | -0.10 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between GTO and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.10 to -0.41, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTO vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
GTO
UGA
GTO vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTO | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 5.47 | -3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.50 | 13.25 | -5.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTO | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.32 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.73 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.39 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.12 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
GTO vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTO drawdown since its inception was -20.61%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTO and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTO | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.61% | -86.59% | +65.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -14.88% | +12.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.98% | -26.68% | +20.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.61% | -38.11% | +17.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.61% | -75.89% | +55.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -12.35% | +10.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -36.76% | +31.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 6.13% | -5.27% |
Volatility
GTO vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) is 1.19%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that GTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTO | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 11.66% | -10.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 30.41% | -27.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43% | 35.14% | -31.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.68% | 34.38% | -28.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.58% | 37.27% | -31.69% |
GTO vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTO vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
GTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | 4.76% | 4.70% | 4.42% | 4.05% | 3.47% | 1.93% | 4.04% | 2.97% | 5.25% | 2.81% | 2.57% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTO and UGA have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to GTO (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTO dropped -20.61% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.43% vs 2.93% for GTO. On fees, GTO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GTO has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.43% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GTO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
GTO has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
GTO is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GTO and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTO and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer