GTO vs. HTRB
GTO (Invesco Total Return Bond ETF) and HTRB (Hartford Total Return Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GTO returned 0.05%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for HTRB. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for HTRB.
Performance
GTO vs. HTRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTO achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than HTRB's 0.41% return.
GTO
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.86%
HTRB
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 4.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- —
GTO vs. HTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | 0.74% | 7.17% | 2.63% | 5.95% | -14.77% | -0.38% | 10.86% | 11.65% | -0.26% | 1.59% |
HTRB Hartford Total Return Bond ETF | 0.41% | 7.38% | 2.35% | 7.15% | -14.36% | -0.80% | 8.87% | 10.39% | -0.88% | 0.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTO and HTRB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between GTO and HTRB shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.95 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTO vs. HTRB — Risk / Return Rank
GTO
HTRB
GTO vs. HTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTO | HTRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.23 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.78 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | 5.00 | +1.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTO vs. HTRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTO drawdown since its inception was -20.61%, which is greater than HTRB's maximum drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTO and HTRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTO | HTRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.61% | -19.48% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -2.82% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.98% | -6.52% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.61% | -19.48% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.57% | -1.40% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -4.79% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 1.00% | -0.11% |
Volatility
GTO vs. HTRB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) is 0.98%, while Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) has a volatility of 1.05%. This indicates that GTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTO | HTRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 1.05% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.59% | 2.81% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.40% | 3.78% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.68% | 6.12% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 5.56% | +0.03% |
GTO vs. HTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HTRB's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTO vs. HTRB - Dividend Comparison
GTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than HTRB's 4.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | 5.18% | 4.70% | 4.42% | 4.05% | 3.47% | 1.93% | 4.04% | 2.97% | 5.25% | 2.81% | 2.57% |
HTRB Hartford Total Return Bond ETF | 4.63% | 4.66% | 4.45% | 3.87% | 3.08% | 4.22% | 4.79% | 6.30% | 2.37% | 0.96% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GTO and HTRB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HTRB has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to GTO (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTO dropped -20.61% vs HTRB's -19.48%.
On 5-year performance, HTRB leads with 0.34% vs 0.05% for GTO. On fees, HTRB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HTRB has performed better with a 0.34% return vs 0.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HTRB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GTO.
GTO has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 4.63% for HTRB.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GTO and 0.29% for HTRB.
GTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTO and HTRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer