PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTO vs. HTRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTO vs. HTRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTO achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than HTRB's 0.41% return.


GTO

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.80%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
2.86%

HTRB

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.54%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTO vs. HTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTO
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
0.74%7.17%2.63%5.95%-14.77%-0.38%10.86%11.65%-0.26%1.59%
HTRB
Hartford Total Return Bond ETF
0.41%7.38%2.35%7.15%-14.36%-0.80%8.87%10.39%-0.88%0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between GTO and HTRB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2017

0.78

The correlation between GTO and HTRB shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.95 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTO vs. HTRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTO
GTO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

HTRB
HTRB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
HTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
HTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTO vs. HTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTOHTRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.78

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.33

5.00

+1.33

GTO vs. HTRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the HTRB Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTO and HTRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTO vs. HTRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTO drawdown since its inception was -20.61%, which is greater than HTRB's maximum drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTO and HTRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTOHTRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.61%

-19.48%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-2.82%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.98%

-6.52%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

-19.48%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-1.40%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-4.79%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

1.00%

-0.11%

Volatility

GTO vs. HTRB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) is 0.98%, while Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) has a volatility of 1.05%. This indicates that GTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTOHTRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

1.05%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

2.81%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40%

3.78%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

6.12%

-0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.59%

5.56%

+0.03%

GTO vs. HTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HTRB's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTO vs. HTRB - Dividend Comparison

GTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than HTRB's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GTO
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
5.18%4.70%4.42%4.05%3.47%1.93%4.04%2.97%5.25%2.81%2.57%
HTRB
Hartford Total Return Bond ETF
4.63%4.66%4.45%3.87%3.08%4.22%4.79%6.30%2.37%0.96%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, GTO and HTRB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HTRB has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to GTO (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTO dropped -20.61% vs HTRB's -19.48%.

On 5-year performance, HTRB leads with 0.34% vs 0.05% for GTO. On fees, HTRB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HTRB has performed better with a 0.34% return vs 0.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HTRB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GTO.

GTO has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 4.63% for HTRB.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GTO and 0.29% for HTRB.

GTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTO and HTRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer