PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTO vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTO vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTO achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, GTO has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 2.86%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.75% annualized return.


GTO

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.80%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
2.86%

TLT

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.06%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.41%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
-1.93%
5Y*
-6.59%
10Y*
-1.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTO vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTO
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
0.74%7.17%2.63%5.95%-14.77%-0.38%10.86%11.65%-0.26%7.41%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.64%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%14.12%-1.61%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GTO and TLT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2016

0.78

The correlation between GTO and TLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTO vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTO
GTO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
GTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTO vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTOTLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.08

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

0.54

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.33

1.29

+5.04

GTO vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTO and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTO vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTO drawdown since its inception was -20.61%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTO and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTOTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.61%

-48.35%

+27.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.73%

-7.58%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.98%

-19.18%

+13.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

-43.70%

+23.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.61%

-48.35%

+27.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-39.89%

+38.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-13.87%

+9.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

3.17%

-2.28%

Volatility

GTO vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) is 0.98%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that GTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTOTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

2.21%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

6.63%

-4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40%

9.50%

-6.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.68%

15.82%

-10.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.59%

14.91%

-9.32%

GTO vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTO vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

GTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than TLT's 4.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTO
Invesco Total Return Bond ETF
5.18%4.70%4.42%4.05%3.47%1.93%4.04%2.97%5.25%2.81%2.57%0.00%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.55%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTO and TLT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLT has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to GTO (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTO dropped -20.61% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 10-year performance, GTO leads with 2.86% vs -1.75% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GTO has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GTO has performed better with a 2.86% return vs -1.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GTO.

GTO has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 4.55% for TLT.

GTO is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while TLT is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GTO and 0.15% for TLT.

GTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTO and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer