GTO vs. CFIT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GTO (Invesco Total Return Bond ETF) and CFIT (Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GTO returned 6.41% vs 12.64% for CFIT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for CFIT.

Performance

GTO vs. CFIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTO achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than CFIT's 5.79% return.

GTO

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 6.41%
• 3Y*: 4.86%
• 5Y*: 0.07%
• 10Y*: 2.93%

CFIT

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 5.79%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 12.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTO vs. CFIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF	0.68%	5.05%
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	5.79%	3.59%

Correlation

The correlation between GTO and CFIT is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2025	0.64

The correlation between GTO and CFIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GTO vs. CFIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTO

GTO Risk / Return Rank: 53
GTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
GTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
GTO Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
GTO Martin Ratio Rank: 46

CFIT

CFIT Risk / Return Rank: 68
CFIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
CFIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
CFIT Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CFIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CFIT Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTO vs. CFIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTO	CFIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.31	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	3.25	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.44	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	3.00	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.50	11.31	-3.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTO vs. CFIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the CFIT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTO and CFIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTO	CFIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	2.31	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	1.49	-0.97

Drawdowns

GTO vs. CFIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTO drawdown since its inception was -20.61%, which is greater than CFIT's maximum drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTO and CFIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTO	CFIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.61%	-4.23%	-16.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.73%	-4.23%	+1.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-0.33%	-1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.80%	-1.20%	-3.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	1.12%	-0.26%

Volatility

GTO vs. CFIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) is 1.19%, while Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that GTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTO	CFIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.19%	1.69%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.50%	4.34%	-1.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.43%	5.50%	-2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.68%	5.46%	+0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.58%	5.46%	+0.12%

GTO vs. CFIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CFIT's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTO vs. CFIT - Dividend Comparison

GTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than CFIT's 4.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF	4.08%	3.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF	4.76%	4.70%	4.42%	4.05%	3.47%	1.93%	4.04%	2.97%	5.25%	2.81%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTO and CFIT in my portfolio?

GTO and CFIT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTO or CFIT?

CFIT has higher volatility (1.69%) compared to GTO (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTO dropped -20.61% vs CFIT's -4.23%.

Which ETF is better, GTO or CFIT?

On 1-year performance, CFIT leads with 12.64% vs 6.41% for GTO. On fees, GTO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GTO has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GTO or CFIT?

Over the 1-year period, CFIT has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTO or CFIT?

GTO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CFIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTO or CFIT?

GTO has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 4.08% for CFIT.

What is the main difference between GTO and CFIT?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GTO and 0.71% for CFIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CFIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.