GTND vs. MATE

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GTND (Goaltender ETF) and MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTND charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MATE.

Performance

GTND vs. MATE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goaltender ETF (GTND) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GTND

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -1.29%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MATE

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -0.60%
• 6M: 8.24%
• YTD: 16.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTND vs. MATE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GTND Goaltender ETF	-0.07%
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF	-2.72%

Correlation

The correlation between GTND and MATE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2026	0.81

Return for Risk

GTND vs. MATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goaltender ETF (GTND) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

GTND vs. MATE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTND drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum MATE drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTND and MATE.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTND	MATE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-13.24%	+7.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.82%	-3.97%	+1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.88%	-3.42%	+1.54%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GTND	MATE	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.86%	22.50%	-4.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.86%	22.50%	-4.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.86%	22.50%	-4.64%

GTND vs. MATE - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTND has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than MATE's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTND vs. MATE - Dividend Comparison

GTND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while MATE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
GTND Goaltender ETF	0.16%
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTND and MATE in my portfolio?

GTND and MATE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GTND or MATE?

On fees, GTND is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTND or MATE?

GTND is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTND or MATE?

GTND has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for MATE.

What is the main difference between GTND and MATE?

They also come from different issuers: Ritholtz Wealth Management and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for GTND and 0.97% for MATE.