GTND vs. GMOD

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

GTND (Goaltender ETF) and GMOD (GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTND charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GMOD.

Performance

GTND vs. GMOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goaltender ETF (GTND) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GTND

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 1.06%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GMOD

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 1.65%
• 6M: 5.60%
• YTD: 7.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTND vs. GMOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GTND Goaltender ETF	-0.05%
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF	1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between GTND and GMOD is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2026	0.73

Return for Risk

GTND vs. GMOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goaltender ETF (GTND) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

GTND vs. GMOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTND drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum GMOD drawdown of -6.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTND and GMOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTND	GMOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-6.50%	+1.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-0.56%	-2.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.83%	-1.11%	-0.72%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GTND	GMOD	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.73%	8.92%	+9.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.73%	8.92%	+9.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.73%	8.92%	+9.81%

GTND vs. GMOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTND has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOD's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTND vs. GMOD - Dividend Comparison

GTND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than GMOD's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF	1.37%	0.93%
GTND Goaltender ETF	0.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTND and GMOD in my portfolio?

GTND and GMOD have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GTND or GMOD?

On fees, GTND is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTND or GMOD?

GTND is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GMOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTND or GMOD?

GMOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.16% for GTND.

What is the main difference between GTND and GMOD?

They also come from different issuers: Ritholtz Wealth Management and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for GTND and 0.50% for GMOD.