GTND vs. GDT
GTND (Goaltender ETF) and GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTND charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for GDT.
Performance
GTND vs. GDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GTND
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTND vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GTND Goaltender ETF | -0.05% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -11.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTND and GDT is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2026 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTND vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goaltender ETF (GTND) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTND vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTND drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum GDT drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTND and GDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTND | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -24.66% | +19.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -22.24% | +19.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -11.99% | +10.16% |
Volatility
GTND vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTND | GDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.73% | 32.28% | -13.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 32.28% | -13.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 32.28% | -13.55% |
GTND vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTND has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTND vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison
GTND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than GDT's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 2.69% |
GTND Goaltender ETF | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTND and GDT have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GTND.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.16% for GTND.
They also come from different issuers: Ritholtz Wealth Management and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for GTND and 0.30% for GDT.
Find the right allocation for GTND and GDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer