GTN vs. INSW
GTN (Gray Television, Inc.) and INSW (International Seaways, Inc.) are both stocks. GTN operates in Broadcasting (Communication Services), while INSW operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 5 years, GTN returned -26.65%/yr vs 50.07%/yr for INSW. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GTN vs. INSW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTN achieves a -17.65% return, which is significantly lower than INSW's 98.69% return.
GTN
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -17.65%
- 6M
- -18.32%
- 1Y
- -4.14%
- 3Y*
- -13.46%
- 5Y*
- -26.65%
- 10Y*
- -7.64%
INSW
- 1D
- 4.64%
- 1M
- 12.03%
- YTD
- 98.69%
- 6M
- 97.84%
- 1Y
- 148.32%
- 3Y*
- 49.17%
- 5Y*
- 50.07%
- 10Y*
- —
GTN vs. INSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTN Gray Television, Inc. | -17.65% | 64.58% | -62.40% | -16.72% | -43.43% | 14.39% | -16.56% | 45.45% | -12.00% | 54.38% |
INSW International Seaways, Inc. | 98.69% | 44.97% | -10.85% | 42.93% | 162.53% | -2.93% | -44.43% | 76.72% | -8.78% | 31.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTN and INSW is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016 | 0.19 |
The correlation between GTN and INSW shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GTN:
$372.48M
INSW:
$4.40B
GTN:
-$0.79
INSW:
$11.01
GTN:
0.12
INSW:
6.49
GTN:
0.25
INSW:
2.00
GTN:
$3.08B
INSW:
$675.87M
GTN:
$3.54B
INSW:
$274.33M
GTN:
$899.00M
INSW:
$525.75M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTN vs. INSW — Risk / Return Rank
GTN
INSW
GTN vs. INSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gray Television, Inc. (GTN) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTN | INSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.54 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 9.23 | -9.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | 26.77 | -26.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTN vs. INSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTN drawdown since its inception was -98.61%, which is greater than INSW's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTN and INSW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTN | INSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.61% | -57.49% | -41.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.59% | -16.16% | -22.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.13% | -50.40% | -18.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.60% | -50.40% | -36.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.73% | 0.00% | -80.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.91% | -20.85% | -24.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.65% | 5.63% | +15.02% |
Volatility
GTN vs. INSW - Volatility Comparison
Gray Television, Inc. (GTN) has a higher volatility of 11.63% compared to International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) at 11.01%. This indicates that GTN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTN | INSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.63% | 11.01% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.60% | 28.32% | +18.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.27% | 36.69% | +27.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.11% | 41.12% | +18.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.21% | 45.29% | +9.92% |
Dividends
GTN vs. INSW - Dividend Comparison
GTN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%, less than INSW's 9.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTN Gray Television, Inc. | 8.33% | 6.61% | 10.16% | 3.57% | 2.86% | 1.59% | 0.00% |
INSW International Seaways, Inc. | 9.42% | 6.04% | 16.05% | 13.83% | 3.84% | 9.26% | 1.47% |
Financials
GTN vs. INSW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gray Television, Inc. and International Seaways, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GTN and INSW have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GTN has higher volatility (11.63%) compared to INSW (11.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTN dropped -98.61% vs INSW's -57.49%.
INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.08 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTN and INSW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer