GTLLX vs. GQSCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GTLLX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio) and GQSCX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio) are both mutual funds - GTLLX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Glenmede, while GQSCX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Glenmede. Over the past 5 years, GTLLX returned 15.11%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for GQSCX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

GTLLX vs. GQSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTLLX achieves a 21.72% return, which is significantly higher than GQSCX's 16.40% return.

GTLLX

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 13.54%
• YTD: 21.72%
• 6M: 22.60%
• 1Y: 39.47%
• 3Y*: 25.88%
• 5Y*: 15.11%
• 10Y*: 16.67%

GQSCX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 16.40%
• 6M: 16.89%
• 1Y: 42.75%
• 3Y*: 19.58%
• 5Y*: 10.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTLLX vs. GQSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GTLLX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio	21.72%	17.44%	20.71%	27.10%	-21.69%	32.91%	18.80%	34.86%	-5.23%	1.00%
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio	16.40%	12.22%	11.49%	18.94%	-8.48%	31.77%	7.60%	22.17%	-11.32%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GTLLX and GQSCX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2017	0.75

The correlation between GTLLX and GQSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GTLLX vs. GQSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTLLX

GTLLX Risk / Return Rank: 70
GTLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
GTLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
GTLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
GTLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
GTLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

GQSCX

GQSCX Risk / Return Rank: 76
GQSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
GQSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
GQSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
GQSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
GQSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTLLX vs. GQSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTLLX	GQSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.48	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	3.48	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.42	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	5.21	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.80	18.24	-2.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTLLX vs. GQSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTLLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the GQSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTLLX and GQSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTLLX	GQSCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	2.48	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.49	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.45	+0.10

Drawdowns

GTLLX vs. GQSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTLLX drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, which is greater than GQSCX's maximum drawdown of -46.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLLX and GQSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTLLX	GQSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.32%	-46.87%	-7.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.76%	-8.74%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.54%	-28.83%	-12.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.54%	-28.83%	-12.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.58%	-8.18%	-0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	2.48%	+0.13%

Volatility

GTLLX vs. GQSCX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio (GQSCX) have volatilities of 4.98% and 5.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTLLX	GQSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.98%	5.11%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.32%	12.40%	+0.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.99%	18.35%	-1.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.00%	21.86%	+7.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.00%	24.81%	+0.19%

GTLLX vs. GQSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GTLLX and GQSCX have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

GTLLX vs. GQSCX - Dividend Comparison

GTLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.59%, more than GQSCX's 2.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GQSCX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Small Cap Equity Portfolio	2.67%	3.01%	10.53%	0.70%	9.45%	10.41%	0.51%	0.59%	0.77%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%
GTLLX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio	12.59%	15.33%	40.42%	4.91%	7.93%	20.20%	15.12%	14.10%	16.97%	2.29%	0.58%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTLLX and GQSCX in my portfolio?

GTLLX and GQSCX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTLLX or GQSCX?

GQSCX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to GTLLX (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTLLX dropped -54.32% vs GQSCX's -46.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GQSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.